Looks like that changes the order the citations are listed at the point of
citation, but not in the generated bibliography at the end of the document?
Unless I'm missing something obvious.
Either way, thanks!
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 4:36 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> At Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:06:30
Hi Benjamin,
On 3/6/2019 6:35 AM, Benjamin Ostendorf wrote:
The data processing is supposed to be centralized on its own machine,
where places are used to parallelize it. I would just do the
processing on the collecting machines, but I need the data sets of
each time step together on one
This reminds me of a similar thread on Slack yesterday.
When a macro `define`s something, it's usually better for everyone if
the identifier is supplied to the macro. It's nicer for you as the
macro writer because you don't need to think so hard about scope and
hygiene. And it's nicer for the
On 3/7/2019 6:50 PM, Jack Firth wrote:
Question for synchronizable event experts: why is there no
`break-evt`? The existence of `sync/enable-break` suggests to me that
it is possible to have mutually exclusive choice between synchronizing
on an event or raising a break. And we have an
At Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:50:40 -0800, Jack Firth wrote:
> Question for synchronizable event experts: why is there no `break-evt`? The
> existence of `sync/enable-break` suggests to me that it is possible to have
> mutually exclusive choice between synchronizing on an event or raising a
> break. And
At Thu, 7 Mar 2019 15:06:30 -0800 (PST), Joey Eremondi wrote:
> I'm using Scribble and Frog to automatically generate a publications list
> from a BibTex file. The problem is, right now I get the same order
> regardless of what order I call ~cite: sorted by year, oldest to newest.
> I'd like
Question for synchronizable event experts: why is there no `break-evt`? The
existence of `sync/enable-break` suggests to me that it is possible to have
mutually exclusive choice between synchronizing on an event or raising a
break. And we have an analogous construct for `sync/timeout` in the form
I'm using Scribble and Frog to automatically generate a publications list
from a BibTex file. The problem is, right now I get the same order
regardless of what order I call ~cite: sorted by year, oldest to newest.
I'd like the reverse of this, with newest at the top. Is it possible to
change
This works exactly like I had hoped, thanks! Now I'm going to see whether I
can figure out how to make a macro that works like include-section which
will automate the importing and renaming.
On Saturday, March 2, 2019 at 1:31:36 PM UTC-7, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> A `#lang scribble/base` module
YouTube videos of
U.S. Congress money laundering hearing
of
Saudi Billionaire " Maan Al sanea"
with *bank of America*
and The owner of Saad Hospital and Schools
in the Eastern Province in *Saudi Arabia*
and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Awal Bank in *Bahrain*
If I remember correctly, the difference is for historical reasons.
Module-level partial expansion uses `local-expand` with a stop list,
while internal-definition partial expansion uses `local-expand` with
`#f` in place of a stop list. Those are not quite the same thing when
`#%app` is bound to a
Is the issue simply that `begin`'s body is not an internal definition
context, but instead spliced into the containing context?
Robby
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 12:01 AM Milo Turner wrote:
>
> I was discussing with a friend some of the edge cases in how internal
> definition contexts and expansion
Ergh, of course I forgot to do that part. Thanks for catching that.
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 1:59 PM Paulo Matos wrote:
>
>
> On 07/03/2019 13:40, Marc Kaufmann wrote:
> > Thanks Paulo, this is way better than the workflow I used the only other
> > time I made a PR. The only thing I had to do was
On 07/03/2019 13:40, Marc Kaufmann wrote:
> Thanks Paulo, this is way better than the workflow I used the only other
> time I made a PR. The only thing I had to do was choose a branch to
> commit to: I chose 'master', mostly because I have no clue what else I
> would have chosen. What is the
On 07/03/2019 13:40, Marc Kaufmann wrote:
> Thanks Paulo, this is way better than the workflow I used the only other
> time I made a PR. The only thing I had to do was choose a branch to
> commit to: I chose 'master', mostly because I have no clue what else I
> would have chosen. What is the
Thanks Paulo, this is way better than the workflow I used the only other
time I made a PR. The only thing I had to do was choose a branch to commit
to: I chose 'master', mostly because I have no clue what else I would have
chosen. What is the default to contribute to?
It was in scribblings by the
On 07/03/2019 11:55, Marc Kaufmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just came across a typo in the documentation and was about to move on
> simply because I couldn't be bothered to figure out how/where to change
> it. I couldn't find the docs in the github repo (I searched for doc, and
> looked under
Hi,
I just came across a typo in the documentation and was about to move on
simply because I couldn't be bothered to figure out how/where to change it.
I couldn't find the docs in the github repo (I searched for doc, and looked
under racket-lang-org without success).
Also, is there a guide
Hi,
I'd love to join in the meetup :-)
Cheers
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, 15:44 Richie Primus wrote:
> Wed Mar 6 15:42:07 GMT 2019
>
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
>
> I'd also be interested.
>
>
> Tuesday evenings work best for me.
>
>
> --
>
> -primus
>
> --
> You received this message because you are
19 matches
Mail list logo
