Regarding your question of using llvm directly. Do people do that? I am going
to figure out as I go but was planning to write the garbage collection part of
the kernel in C and the procedure application part in machine language. Could I
just write llvm directly? (This is my first time using
On 12/12/19 10:36 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
Yes, basically. I'd say it's showing how to translate that Racket code
(taken from Shriram Krishnmurthi's JFP paper/LL1 talk) into Sham.
Nice. Looking forward to less brief summary of the tool.
--
Anthony Carrico
--
You received this message
Yes, basically. I'd say it's showing how to translate that Racket code
(taken from Shriram Krishnmurthi's JFP paper/LL1 talk) into Sham.
Sam
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:32 PM Anthony Carrico wrote:
>
> On 12/12/19 10:05 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> > You might be interested in our project
On 12/12/19 10:05 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
You might be interested in our project Sham
So is this compiling a state machine (or, two actually) to llvm and
running against a Racket oracle?
https://github.com/rjnw/sham/blob/master/test/automata.rkt
--
Anthony Carrico
--
You received
You might be interested in our project Sham:
https://github.com/rjnw/sham which is a Racket interface for easily
using LLVM.
Documentation coming soon, but you can see some examples here:
https://github.com/rjnw/sham/tree/master/test
Sam
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:03 PM Nathaniel Griswold
Racket to generate llvm
> On Dec 12, 2019, at 3:35 PM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:49:01AM -0800, Nathaniel Griswold wrote:
>> I am almost done with chapter 5 of SICP which i have been working on in
>> racket.
>>
>> My plan now is to write a scheme compiler/interpreter
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:49:01AM -0800, Nathaniel Griswold wrote:
> I am almost done with chapter 5 of SICP which i have been working on in
> racket.
>
> My plan now is to write a scheme compiler/interpreter with garbage
> collection that runs in native language in racket. I think i will use
Error trace is what DrRacket is using under the hood too.
Robby
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 1:15 PM Nathaniel Griswold
wrote:
> I have discovered that if i do a C-u C-c C-c i get better error messages
> and can navigate to the proper spot. It uses something called errortrace.
> So i guess this is
I have discovered that if i do a C-u C-c C-c i get better error messages
and can navigate to the proper spot. It uses something called errortrace.
So i guess this is a non-issue.
On Thursday, December 12, 2019 at 12:53:55 PM UTC-6, Nathaniel Griswold
wrote:
>
> Hello. I really like DrRacket's
Hello. I really like DrRacket's error output but i have recently switched
to emacs as i prefer its parenthesis navigation modes and other things
about it.
One thing i noticed is when i have an error, say application with wrong
number of args, if i navigate to error using "C-x `" i don't skip
I am almost done with chapter 5 of SICP which i have been working on in
racket.
My plan now is to write a scheme compiler/interpreter with garbage
collection that runs in native language in racket. I think i will use llvm.
On Tuesday, December 10, 2019 at 2:13:49 AM UTC-6, Stephen De Gabrielle
11 matches
Mail list logo
