Re: [racket-users] Gtk initialization failed for display ":0"

Matthew Flatt writes: > At Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:36:33 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> Following up on Sam's suggestion, I recommend `xfvb-run` as something >> like >> >> xfvb-run racket -l handin-server > > Should be `xvfb-run`. I always have trouble getting those letters in > the right order. We

[racket-users] Re: Gtk initialization failed for display ":0"

Matthew Flatt writes: > At Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:36:33 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> Following up on Sam's suggestion, I recommend `xfvb-run` as something >> like >> >> xfvb-run racket -l handin-server > > Should be `xvfb-run`. I always have trouble getting those letters in > the right order. W

[racket-users] Re: Gtk initialization failed for display ":0"

Matthew Flatt writes: > At Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:36:33 -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote: >> Following up on Sam's suggestion, I recommend `xfvb-run` as something >> like >> >> xfvb-run racket -l handin-server > > Should be `xvfb-run`. I always have trouble getting those letters in > the right order. W

Re: [racket-users] Embedded racket (cs) question

Great, thanks for all of that digging. Ya, i think i will go the non-declare_modules, non-ctool route for now as i think this fits my use-case pretty well. I want to allow access to the full racket library for racket code that changes often. Nate On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 8:32 PM Matthew Flatt wr

Re: [racket-users] require and syntax-case

> There is another way: syntax-local-introduce will remove the macro scope. `syntax-local-introduce` is no longer useful for this purpose since the switch to the scope sets model. Other scopes, such as module scopes, will often distinguish the macro-introduced name. For example, using `syntax-l