[racket-users] Defining a symbol breaks symbols?

2015-09-30 Thread Lyle Kopnicky
Hi folks, It seems that if I (incorrectly) quote a symbol in a 'define' form, it breaks all symbols from that point on. I would expect instead it would give me an error saying that I passed the wrong sort of thing to 'define', and not break future use of symbols. Is this a bug? Welcome to DrRa

Fwd: [racket-users] Defining a symbol breaks symbols?

2015-09-30 Thread Lyle Kopnicky
-- Forwarded message -- From: *Lyle Kopnicky* Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 Subject: [racket-users] Defining a symbol breaks symbols? To: Jason Hemann Ha, thanks, Jens and Jason, for the explanation. That makes sense. I'm used to static languages lately and it

Re: off topic, Re: [racket-users] Defining a symbol breaks symbols?

2015-10-08 Thread Lyle Kopnicky
d apply. On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > > On Oct 2, 2015, at 9:50 AM, "John B. Clements" > wrote: > > > > >> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Matthias Felleisen > wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sep