Hi folks,
It seems that if I (incorrectly) quote a symbol in a 'define' form, it breaks
all symbols from that point on. I would expect instead it would give me an
error saying that I passed the wrong sort of thing to 'define', and not break
future use of symbols. Is this a bug?
Welcome to DrRa
-- Forwarded message --
From: *Lyle Kopnicky*
Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015
Subject: [racket-users] Defining a symbol breaks symbols?
To: Jason Hemann
Ha, thanks, Jens and Jason, for the explanation. That makes sense. I'm used
to static languages lately and it
d apply.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Matthias Felleisen
wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 2, 2015, at 9:50 AM, "John B. Clements"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:57 PM, Matthias Felleisen
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sep
3 matches
Mail list logo