75) > 2^53.
>
> For a lot more on how errors propagate through floating-point programs
> and what to do about it, you can read my article on it, which seems to
> still be freely available here:
>
>
> http://www.computer.org/cms/Computer.org/ComputingNow/issues/2014/10/mcs
On 12/01/2014 06:17 PM, Neil Toronto wrote:
> #lang racket
>
> (require racket/extflonum
> math/bigfloat)
>
> (define phi.t 1.6180339887498948482t0)
>
> (real->extfl (bigfloat->real (bfexpt (bf (extfl->exact phi.t))
> (bf 1474
> (extflexpt phi.t
To all,
I have a project that I'm trying to compile to a single bytecode file via
(raco demod). I compile a module .rkt file which requires several library
module .rkt files. One of these module .rkt files is a windowing library that
call on #lang racket/gui. (raco demod) manages to flatten and
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:34:59 AM you wrote:
> To all,
>
> I have a project that I'm trying to compile to a single bytecode file via
> (raco demod). I compile a module .rkt file which requires several library
> module .rkt files. One of these module .rkt files is a windowing library
> that c
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:39:54 AM you wrote:
> On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:34:59 AM you wrote:
> > To all,
> >
> > I have a project that I'm trying to compile to a single bytecode file via
> > (raco demod). I compile a module .rkt file which requires several library
> > module .rkt files.
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:03:13 PM you wrote:
> On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:39:54 AM you wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 25, 2015 01:34:59 AM you wrote:
> > > To all,
> > >
> > > I have a project that I'm trying to compile to a single bytecode file
> > > via
> > > (raco demod). I compile a m
To All,
I recently encountered an issue while trying to demodularize my modules to
create a single bytecode file. Apparently raco demod has issues with the
racket gui code.
Hence, I've created a source code level demodularizer. It basically reads the
require statements in the source code and i
To all,
I've been recently working on a database and I've encountered strange behavior
when I use "call-with-atomic-output-file" and "with-output-to-file". Attached
is a sample piece of code. The correct contents of the SOAP file should be :
*First-Name : John
*Last-Name : Doe
*Gender : male
*Pho
On Tuesday, June 02, 2015 04:47:33 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> I think you wanted `(and (>=` in place of `(or (<`.
That did it, thanks a lot!
Mistake on my part when I wrote it, the string-length check was added
afterwords so I used an or statement instead of an and.
Regards,
Mark
--
You receive
To All,
This message has been chronically sent to the mailing list. Can we
classify it as spam and unrelated to the Racket Language?
Regards,
Mark
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Kasem A wrote:
YouTube videos of
U.S. Congress money laundering hearing
of
Saudi Billionaire " Maan Al
10 matches
Mail list logo