Re: [racket] Question about sandbox.rktl failing its unit test

2013-07-04 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
I believe this was not related to symbolic links, and has now been fixed. Sam On Jul 4, 2013 3:27 AM, "Tim Brown" wrote: > On 03/07/13 21:46, Tobias Hammer wrote: > >> Have you tried the current HEAD? There were some changes in the handling >> of symlinks on *nix platforms after 5.3.5 that might

Re: [racket] Question about sandbox.rktl failing its unit test

2013-07-04 Thread Tim Brown
On 03/07/13 21:46, Tobias Hammer wrote: Have you tried the current HEAD? There were some changes in the handling of symlinks on *nix platforms after 5.3.5 that might fix this. Thanks for getting back to me. I'll try that... I haven't looked much further into this, since I didn't know whether s

[racket] Question about sandbox.rktl failing its unit test

2013-07-01 Thread Tim Brown
Folks, I've just built racket-5.3.5 on Solaris-11 Intel (32 and 64 bit flavours). Because I need to embed Racket into C, as well as run it standalone, I have also built both the CGC (Boehm) and 3m (default) versions. So that's four versions of racket. All of which seem to run with stability. Ho