On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 12:36:13PM -0500, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
>
> Have you considered classes instead of structs? -- Matthias
Matthias,
Thanks for the response.
Classes did cross my mind, but in the particular use case I'm working on
now, they feel a little too heavy. Perhaps that is a r
Have you considered classes instead of structs? -- Matthias
On Nov 9, 2013, at 12:50 PM, David T. Pierson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sometimes when defining struct types it is useful to have fields which
> are essentially "private" to the module (fields whose accessors/mutators
> are not exported f
Hi all,
Sometimes when defining struct types it is useful to have fields which
are essentially "private" to the module (fields whose accessors/mutators
are not exported from the module.) I want these fields to be initialized
automatically with arbitrary values generated at construction time.
Here
3 matches
Mail list logo