For people who read mail as plain text and don't see hyperlinks, here they're
in the order of appearance in the text:
-- code being discussed http://pasterack.org/pastes/8580
-- source for process*/ports
https://github.com/plt/racket/blob/master/racket/collects/racket/system.rkt
-- answer by M.
> You have a synchronization problem. The copy-port within foo starts
> reading the input file stream and hits EOF before the copy-port within
> the separate thread starts writing to the file.
David Pierson, you're absolutely right. This is exactly the problem with my
hacky solution, which you
On Nov 12, 2013, at 11:55 PM, David T. Pierson wrote:
> Do you really need a file stream port and not just an input port?
Vlad, are you looking for pipes?
Racket Users list:
http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:55:22PM -0500, David T. Pierson wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Vlad Kozin wrote:
> > Can somebody pls have a look at this code. I can't figure out why it
> > doesn't work. Input is certainly seen inside the background thread
> > that I spawn to pump data from one p
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Vlad Kozin wrote:
> Can somebody pls have a look at this code. I can't figure out why it
> doesn't work. Input is certainly seen inside the background thread
> that I spawn to pump data from one port to another. But the main
> thread seems to receive an empty port.
Hi
I should also mention that doing this by creating a temporary file feels
incredibly hacky if only because it never gets deleted. If anyone can think of
a better pattern pls share.
thanks
---
Vlad Kozin
On Nov 12, 2013, at 4:04 PM, Vlad Kozin wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Can somebody pls have a l
Hi all.
Can somebody pls have a look at this code. I can't figure out why it doesn't
work. Input is certainly seen inside the background thread that I spawn to pump
data from one port to another. But the main thread seems to receive an empty
port.
Thanks
---
Vlad Kozin
___
7 matches
Mail list logo
