Re: [racket-users] `eqv?` vs `eq?` for interned numbers & characters

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Matthew Butterick wrote: > The docs say `eqv?` differs from `eq?` only for nmbers and characters. But > is this still true since numbers and characters became interned data types > in 2011? [1] > That mail thread is specifically about *literal*

[racket-users] `eqv?` vs `eq?` for interned numbers & characters

The docs say `eqv?` differs from `eq?` only for nmbers and characters. But is this still true since numbers and characters became interned data types in 2011? [1] If it were true I would've expected the docs to say so; OTOH the docs do not provide an example of, say, a pair of numbers where