subject:"\[racket\-users\] Bug with errortrace and begin\-for\-syntax\?"

Re: [racket-users] Bug with errortrace and begin-for-syntax?

2015-10-10 Thread Spencer Florence

Yup, that looks like a bug. I've created a PR to fix it: https://github.com/racket/errortrace/pull/4 On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 8:51 AM Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > On Oct 10, 2015, at 12:06 AM, Alex Knauth wrote: > > #lang racket/base > (require (for-meta 0 racket/base) > (for-meta 1 rac

Re: [racket-users] Bug with errortrace and begin-for-syntax?

2015-10-10 Thread Matthias Felleisen

> On Oct 10, 2015, at 12:06 AM, Alex Knauth wrote: > > #lang racket/base > (require (for-meta 0 racket/base) > (for-meta 1 racket/base) > (for-meta 2 racket/base) > (for-meta 3 racket/base) > (for-meta 4 racket/base)) > (begin-for-syntax > (begin-for-syntax >

[racket-users] Bug with errortrace and begin-for-syntax?

2015-10-09 Thread Alex Knauth

The error below doesn't point to my own code, but to here, in errortrace-lib.rkt: (syntax-case* disarmed-expr (begin-for-syntax module module*) (lambda (a b) (free-identifier=? a b phase 0)) [(begin-for-syntax body ...)