On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 11:08 AM Matthew Flatt wrote:
> Are there other useful variants that are not currently supported (at least
> directly)?
>
I think the answer to this is “no.” My reasoning follows.
>From the perspective of subclasses, superclass methods come in three sorts:
overridable, a
I agree that this doesn't look possible within a single class, but I
don't see any problem with the pattern (aside from being awkward to
write). As far as I can tell, it would make sense for `class` to
support new a case that fuses your `overment` plus `augride` steps.
Internally, that would create
On 7/17/2021 1:10 AM, Alexis King wrote:
:
a complex, possibly error-prone, way to front-end class method dispatch
:
This brings me to my question: is there any simpler way to do this?
And are there any hidden gotchas to my technique?
I'm still trying to understand how it works. 8-)
Hello,
While doing some OOP in Racket today, I found myself in a situation that
would benefit from two seemingly contradictory things:
1.
I want to be able to override a superclass method, and I want to be
certain that I get to handle the method before any of my subclasses do.
This s
4 matches
Mail list logo