I'm playing around with SICP's Metacircular Scheme Evaluator, and thought it
would be convenient to try and do that in a #lang setup in Racket, so I can use
the Racket Definition Window and REPL. No Reader modification is needed, since
Scheme code is already S-expressions. The expander just call
> This works fine in the ME-test.rkt Definition window, but not in the REPL
> which doesn't have bindings for anything. I would like anything typed into
> the ME-test.rkt REPL to be used as argument to the ME-module-begin macro in
> ME-expander.rkt.
I'm not sure but since no one has replied yet
On Sunday, March 19, 2017 at 6:46:24 PM UTC+1, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> > This works fine in the ME-test.rkt Definition window, but not in the REPL
> > which doesn't have bindings for anything. I would like anything typed into
> > the ME-test.rkt REPL to be used as argument to the ME-module-begi
> On Mar 20, 2017, at 2:59 AM, Jan Hondebrink wrote:
>
> Testing top-interaction with expression: (#%top-interaction + 1 2)
> . +: unbound identifier;
> also, no #%app syntax transformer is bound in: +
>
> So when you pass an expression through to the racket/base #%module-begin, it
> can use t
On Monday, March 20, 2017 at 7:25:35 PM UTC+1, Matthew Butterick wrote:
> On Mar 20, 2017, at 2:59 AM, Jan Hondebrink wrote:
>
> Testing top-interaction with expression: (#%top-interaction + 1 2)
> . +: unbound identifier;
> also, no #%app syntax transformer is bound in: +
>
> So when you pass a
5 matches
Mail list logo