Hi Jimmy
I guess I had assumed Racket2 would also be an opportunity as a standard
> library upgrade, maybe take into account some of the "remix" library ideas,
> things like that.
>
My understanding of the 'Racket2' RFC's process is it is about offering a
new syntax to make Racket more accessible
Thanks Stephen,
I'm aware of the RFC page and that it's a community driven project.
In terms of flexibility, racket feels like it is the most powerful
language. I have written racket in production for Global Payments for a
major data migration tool, although they made me rewrite it in python 3
aft
Thanks Jimmy,
This is a really interesting list. I think many of the items will interest
others.
[I’m not part of the Racket team - so the following is my opinion]
I think it is important to remember open source project that runs on
volunteer efforts of individual contributors building the packa
I've compiled a list of really nice features from other
languages/applications
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gCfE9I7FMNJILKlL1RWGMn1AS_pWpIV73DsWlrApSx0/edit?usp=sharing
I have more ideas than time, and I'm sure some of these may sound
ridiculous or be way too time consuming, but hopefull
4 matches
Mail list logo