Re: [racket-users] Question about log-ticks

2015-08-29 Thread Marduk Bolaños
Great! Thanks a lot! Still, I would like to know why this is not the default behaviour of plot. Cheers, Marduk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [racket-users] Question about log-ticks

2015-08-28 Thread Benjamin Greenman
I'm not sure if this is intended, but I do have a hack to add them in manually: (parameterize ([plot-y-transform log-transform] [plot-y-ticks (log-ticks #:number 6)]) (define xs (range 1 11)) (define ys (map (lambda (x) (exp x)) xs)) (define extra-ticks (for/list ([n (in-range 2

[racket-users] Question about log-ticks

2015-08-28 Thread Marduk Bolaños
Dear all, I did a scatter plot with a logarithmic Y-axis. It looks fine but there is something that really bugs me: there are no minor ticks between the X-axis and the first major tick. Here is the code: #lang racket (require plot) (parameterize ([plot-y-transform log-transform]