Re: [racket-users] Racket, Erlang, concurrency and performance

2016-08-14 Thread Matthew Flatt
To a first approximation, Racket places have that same property: different places do not share mutable data, so each place has its own GC. More precisely, there is a shared space that is used to set up communication, but GCs there are rare and triggered only by creating new place channels. Passing

[racket-users] Racket, Erlang, concurrency and performance

2016-08-13 Thread Cary Cherng
Do Racket places suffer performance-wise in comparison to Erlang in that the garbage collector cannot assume that everything in one thread is immutable and inaccessible to anyone else so that each thread can have its own garbage collector. -- You received this message because you are subscribe