Re: [racket-users] Racket Guide, REs, section 9.5

2018-11-09 Thread Jussi Salmela
Thanks for answering. I was at my wits’ end trying to think how the behavior of those two would differ and even tried a couple of experiments, to no avail unfortunately. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: [racket-users] Racket Guide, REs, section 9.5

2018-11-08 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Tue, 6 Nov 2018 09:53:38 -0800 (PST), Jussi Salmela wrote: > At the end of section 9.5 there is the sentence: > >The non-greedy quantifiers are respectively: *?, +?, ??, {m}?, {m,n}?. > > I don't understand what {m}? is supposed to match because {m} means 'match > exactly the previous

[racket-users] Racket Guide, REs, section 9.5

2018-11-06 Thread Jussi Salmela
At the end of section 9.5 there is the sentence: The non-greedy quantifiers are respectively: *?, +?, ??, {m}?, {m,n}?. I don't understand what {m}? is supposed to match because {m} means 'match exactly the previous pattern'. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the