Re: [racket-users] Re: Intriguing performance difference between Windows and Linux on `(factorial 100000)`

2019-03-24 Thread Shu-Hung You
Interesting. This is the timing on Mac. Comparing to Alex's result, the numbers roughly match "< 7s" v.s. "> 13s" while fact-1 is close. $ racket Welcome to Racket v7.2.0.3. > (enter! "factorial.rkt") "factorial.rkt"> (equal? (fact 10) (fact-1 10)) #t "factorial.rkt"> (time (void (fact-1

[racket-users] Re: Intriguing performance difference between Windows and Linux on `(factorial 100000)`

2019-03-24 Thread Alex Harsanyi
You can check if the big number multiplication is the problem, by using a factorial version which does not need so many big number multiplications: #lang racket/base (require racket/math) (define (fact n) (if (zero? n) 1 (* n (fact (- n 1) (define (fact-1 n) (define nslots