> On Jul 15, 2016, at 12:22 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
>
> But I'm hitting scope issues - I'm not sure hot to make the redefinitions of
> func available in (body ...) in a (with-foo func body ...) use, naively
> adding the require imports fails to bring them into scope. Various
> combinations of u
> On Jul 15, 2016, at 1:54 AM, Jack Firth wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 14, 2016 at 10:28:07 PM UTC-7, mattap...@gmail.com wrote:
>> On Friday, July 15, 2016 at 2:22:50 PM UTC+10, Jack Firth wrote:
>>> I'd also like `with-foo` to be the only way to access the versions of
>>> helper1 and helper2
I've got a macro that extends function definition by letting the user rebind
some identifiers with different values, which are then only available in a
certain context. For the sake of simplicity suppose it looks like this:
(define/foo (func v ...)
#:bind [helper1 expr]
#:bind [helper2 other
3 matches
Mail list logo
