I missed this thread when it first went by.
I backup the pasterack db occasionally and I don't delete pastes,
other than illegal stuff as determined by a nightly script. But the
redis db only writes to disk every so often so some pastes could get
lost. (Ironically the links in question are no long
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Tim Brown wrote:
> 3 is not as necessary as “ownership” -- http://pasterack.org/pastes/31401
> is
> a work in progress of http://pasterack.org/pastes/1055 ; I don’t want to
> verion control it, but I _do_ want to delete #31401. But it needs to be
> verifiab
On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 12:25:54 AM UTC+1, Greg Hendershott wrote:
> There's http://pasterack.org/ which is awesome. Folks frequently use
> it on #racket IRC. It can optionally evaluate the code, too.
I seem to have missed that it was a “racket-specific“ paste bin. Somehow I
conflated i
There's http://pasterack.org/ which is awesome. Folks frequently use
it on #racket IRC. It can optionally evaluate the code, too.
However:
1. I don't know its long-term retention intention (or reality).
2. I don't think it aspires to the discoverablity implied by your use case.
3. It doesn't supp
www.pasterack.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/
Folks,
This morning I wrote a function which seemed quite sharable. It took a pict,
converted it into a PNG bytes, base64-encode'd it and put it into an tag.
It was all of three lines long, was too short to (IMO) put into a library, but
I thought it was a valuable “snippet”.
Is there anywhere
6 matches
Mail list logo
