Re: [racket-users] scribble racketresultblock and racketinput

2016-03-08 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Thanks, Matthew. Maybe some examples in the docs of the preferred way to use `racketinput` with single- and multi-line results would be good. For a long time, I've been doing both of the following, and I could always see that they were wrong: (racketinput (+ 1 2)

Re: [racket-users] scribble racketresultblock and racketinput

2016-03-07 Thread Matthew Flatt
At Mon, 7 Mar 2016 18:55:15 -0700, Matthew Flatt wrote: > (I think the documentation should say that `racketinput` uses the > 'code-inset style, and I'll fix that.) On closer inspection, the missing documentation seems to be that `racketresult` doesn't use the 'code-inset style, while

Re: [racket-users] scribble racketresultblock and racketinput

2016-03-07 Thread Matthew Flatt
If you want input and output to be together as an interaction, I recommend using `examples` (from `scribble/example`) with `eval:alts` to provide a result manually. If "the same vertical line" just means "the same style of vertical line", you could use @nested[#:style 'code-inset

[racket-users] scribble racketresultblock and racketinput

2016-03-07 Thread Neil Van Dyke
In Scribble, how does one use `racketresultblock` in combination with `racketinput`, such that the result expression is formatted with the same vertical line that the input expression has? (I know how to do this with `racketresult`, but not for multi-line results.) Neil V. -- You received