On Saturday, June 25, 2016 at 8:13:04 AM UTC+10, Matthew Flatt wrote:
>
> For what it's worth, I recommend avoiding `namespace-variable-value`.
> There's usually a better way, but it depends on what you're trying to
> do.
>
Thanks much for the lead, I am now using eval with relevant custom name
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 08:20:30 UTC+10, Matt A. Peerson wrote:
> On Saturday, 25 June 2016 08:13:04 UTC+10, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> > If you write
> >
> > (struct point (x y))
> >
> > then `point` is bound as syntax that both expands to the `point`
> > constructor and provides static inform
On Saturday, 25 June 2016 08:13:04 UTC+10, Matthew Flatt wrote:
> If you write
>
> (struct point (x y))
>
> then `point` is bound as syntax that both expands to the `point`
> constructor and provides static information about the point` structure
> (as used, for example, by `match`).
>
> You c
If you write
(struct point (x y))
then `point` is bound as syntax that both expands to the `point`
constructor and provides static information about the point` structure
(as used, for example, by `match`).
You could avoid the indirection through syntax, sacrificing static
information, by addin
4 matches
Mail list logo
