Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-27 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Pasting some clarification from a different thread into this one... Neil Van Dyke wrote on 12/26/18 5:09 PM: BTW, to be clear (since it took me a while to unravel the vague and changing meanings of Jupyter and IPython the other day)... What I proposed in another thread here was adding an user

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-27 Thread Spencer Florence
One exists: https://github.com/rmculpepper/iracket On Thu, Dec 27, 2018, 12:53 AM Andrew Gwozdziewycz It seems like the better bang for buck might be implementing a Jupyter > kernel, and leveraging that ecosystem. > > https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter/wiki/Jupyter-kernels > > On Dec 20, 2018, a

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-26 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 10:26 PM Tom Gillespie wrote: > > Neil mentioned Ryan's work on this in the thread about hacker news. There are > a number of issues with getting jupyter to play nicely with #langs some of > which I have submitted a pr for, but my solution is partial and very > suboptima

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-26 Thread Tom Gillespie
Neil mentioned Ryan's work on this in the thread about hacker news. There are a number of issues with getting jupyter to play nicely with #langs some of which I have submitted a pr for, but my solution is partial and very suboptimal. A drracket-like solution, even just for kernels is likely not

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-26 Thread Andrew Gwozdziewycz
It seems like the better bang for buck might be implementing a Jupyter kernel, and leveraging that ecosystem. https://github.com/jupyter/jupyter/wiki/Jupyter-kernels > On Dec 20, 2018, at 02:46, Neil Van Dyke wrote: > > If anyone is looking to avoid relatives over the winter holiday season, >

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-26 Thread Neil Van Dyke
Stephen De Gabrielle wrote on 12/26/18 7:29 AM: Would this replace ‘interactions’, or would it be a new editor<%>? UI conceptual-wise, I think it would probably be a mode, in which Notebook window replaces Definitions and Interactions windows. Implementation-wise, I suspect it would probably

Re: [racket-users] project idea: drracket notebook mode

2018-12-26 Thread Stephen De Gabrielle
Like Maxima? DrRacket interactions already does most of what Jupyter and Maxima does, but lacks the functionality of cells, and the ability to re-evaluate them. Would this replace ‘interactions’, or would it be a new editor<%>? It’s a great idea - it seems a little like ‘code bubbles’, but for