Re: [Radiance-dev] Python scripts for Radiance

The problem that code solves is finding the name of the invoked command and getting rid of the Windows .exe extension. I'd write it a bit differently: from os.path import basename, splitext ... progname = splitext(basename(sys.argv[0]))[0] (or, at length) progfile =

Re: [Radiance-dev] Python scripts for Radiance

All I can say is: SHORTPROGN = os.path.splitext(os.path.split(sys.argv[0])[1])[0] > From: Georg Mischler > Subject: Re: [Radiance-dev] Python scripts for Radiance > Date: March 21, 2016 4:22:47 PM PDT > > You're arguing with some of the most syntactitcally

Re: [Radiance-dev] Python scripts for Radiance

You're arguing with some of the most syntactitcally complex aspects of current programming languages here. (STL?!?) In contrast, Pythons syntax was specifically designed to be easy to understand and use (there's a lot of research into that). Maybe you should just invest an hour and play through

Re: [Radiance-dev] Python scripts for Radiance

Dear Georg, I would vote for the glaze csh script. Best, Wouter On 03/21/2016 05:02 PM, Georg Mischler wrote: Hi again! I have converted some of the original Radiance shell scripts into Python.

[Radiance-dev] Python scripts for Radiance

Hi again! I have converted some of the original Radiance shell scripts into Python. https://github.com/gmischler/PyRad The examples so far are exact drop-in replacements of the original csh or Perl versions, but with some extra functionality and benefits. * usage instructions (-H) *