[Radiant] Performance

Hello List, I'm having some performance issues on a site based on Radiant. http://www.ffinfo.nl It's running on Radiant 0.6.2 Sample in the log: Processing SiteController#show_page (for 66.249.65.136 at 2007-11-14 11:52:20) [GET] Parameters: {url=[nl, vliegbinden, gastbinders,

Re: [Radiant] Performance

Thanks, I will check that out, looks really promising. Peter. On Nov 14, 2007 1:16 PM, Aitor Garay-Romero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your site (nice work!) looks mostly static, you can try the snapshot extension: http://lists.radiantcms.org/pipermail/radiant/2007-October/006823.html

[Radiant] Has anyone used the PluginAWeek Version?

Has anyone played around with http://api.pluginaweek.org/mini_radiant/? It sounds like a great idea - and it seems like it would make it a lot easier to port existing rails apps - something like: * piston all of the plugins * update some configs to fix the load order * run some migrations

[Radiant] shards and admin_tree_structure

Hi, I upgraded my radiant installation from admin_parts to shards yesterday, and it works like a charm. Today, I wanted to give admin_tree_structure a try because I'm begining to get a bit too much posts on my blog 0:-) It kinda works, but the comments column added by the comments extension on

Re: [Radiant] Performance

Peter, Are you using mongrel_cluster? If so, I would make sure you don't run more than 2 mongrel processes. On an app I worked on this summer that was hosted on a 256 slice, we would have major problems if we ran more than two, our app would screech to a halt after about an hour of hitting

Re: [Radiant] Radius integration with rails app

Sean Cribbs wrote: Depends on if you want to use just Radius, or the whole Radiant application. If you want to use just Radius, you can install the gem and require it like you would any other gem. Then you would define your own context and tags within it, set up the parser and go. For the

Re: [Radiant] Radius integration with rails app

Maged, If you can stand to run two separate applications, the easiest solution is to use the web server to route requests to Radiant depending on the domain or URL. You won't get integration between, but it would be a quick temporary solution until you can find a way to integrate them better.

Re: [Radiant] Performance

Sean Cribbs wrote: Are you using mongrel_cluster? If so, I would make sure you don't run more than 2 mongrel processes. On an app I worked on this summer that was hosted on a 256 slice, we would have major problems if we ran more than two, our app would screech to a halt after about an hour

Re: [Radiant] shards and admin_tree_structure

Today, I wanted to give admin_tree_structure a try because I'm begining to get a bit too much posts on my blog 0:-) It kinda works, but the comments column added by the comments extension on the pages listing is empty now (what a surprise, as both override _node.rhtml) but I can live without

Re: [Radiant] shards and admin_tree_structure

I upgraded my radiant installation from admin_parts to shards yesterday, and it works like a charm. Today, I wanted to give admin_tree_structure a try because Have just updated admin_tree_structure to work with the latest core + shards.