Re: [Radiant] [ANN] New Radiant site(s)

2008-02-04 Thread Marty Haught
Congratulations Sean. Nice work and great contribution back to the community. Cheers, Marty ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@lists.radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/list

Re: [Radiant] installing copy/move in 0.6.4

2008-01-05 Thread Marty Haught
> But after I created my home page, I get an error when I try to view > the pages list. It looks like it has something to do with Shards - so > it may not be Copy/Move, but I can't tell since this is the first time > I've tried to use 0.6.4. The output of the error is below: > > Showing vendor/ext

Re: [Radiant] A Few Modest Proposals

2008-01-02 Thread Marty Haught
Hey Sean, I like both ideas. Since I've helped organize a conference I'll attest that it can be serious work. It all depends on how big you want to make it. One thought on it that comes to mind is what if we connect the conference to RailsConf? Such as have it on Thursday or maybe Wednesday?

Re: [Radiant] Best Hosts for Radiant?

2007-11-08 Thread Marty Haught
> I would very much like to see your notes. I started to do the chroot > thing, but quickly decided against it. http://wiki.slicehost.com/doku.php?id=install_litespeed_on_ubuntu I had posted my install notes on Slicehost's wiki a while back and it's still there. ia32-libs was the package I inst

Re: [Radiant] Best Hosts for Radiant?

2007-11-08 Thread Marty Haught
On Nov 8, 2007 11:37 AM, Phillip Koebbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Out of curiosity, did you license the 64bit enterprise version or did > you chroot the 32bit free version? I'm on SliceHost as well, and > have been considering LiteSpeed, but didn't want to futz with the > chroot path. I'm not

Re: [Radiant] Best Hosts for Radiant?

2007-11-08 Thread Marty Haught
On Nov 8, 2007 11:07 AM, Travis Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with a big thumbs up for LiteSpeed. We run LiteSpeed on our > production and dev environments primarily for it's ease of use with > Rails. On top of that, it's fast to boot and always "just works". I also use LightSpeed on m

Re: [Radiant] JuneBug Wiki

2007-11-04 Thread Marty Haught
What wiki would you look at using next? I also need to install a wiki for a community group and would prefer to use a Ruby-based one. Any suggestions on what would be the best choice? Cheers, Marty On 11/4/07, John W. Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 2, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Richard Hurt wr

Re: [Radiant] 3 level deep navigation tags

2007-06-07 Thread Marty Haught
> Check back through the mailing-list archives for information about the > sitemap snippet. It does most of what you want. > > @Marty Haught - would you be willing to share the working code for the > if_ancestor tag? I haven't looked at it in a while. Sorry, just saw this

[Radiant] Recommended Install Approach

2007-05-31 Thread Marty Haught
Hi Guys, I currently have several radiant apps that are all installed off the svn trunk (some of which are no longer up-to-date). I've seen mention of the preferred way of installing Radiant as switching back to the gem and perhaps going with instance mode if you think you'll be modifying any cod

Re: [Radiant] Building dynamic navs

2007-02-28 Thread Marty Haught
I wanted to post a follow-up on my original email on building dynamic navs. Thanks to the several folks who have posted their own solutions. I chatted a couple times with Sean and came up with an almost all snippet/tag solution. The only trick is I need this new tag based on a recent patch by Se

Re: [Radiant] Building dynamic navs

2007-02-12 Thread Marty Haught
On 2/8/07, Michael Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wrote my own tag (wrapped in an extension) to do this Marty. > > I'll paste the code snips in here they may be able to help you out, if > you want more I could post a zip file somewhere. Yeah, I think this is probably the road I need to go d

[Radiant] Building dynamic navs

2007-02-07 Thread Marty Haught
Okay, so I'm trying my hand at building a dynamic nav within Radiant for the first time. The top nav is static and I used the navigation tag for it. Though when someone clicks on one of the top links potentially it could display sub links beneath it such as this when the user has clicked the abou

Re: [Radiant] Ruby/Rails Conference

2007-01-19 Thread Marty Haught
> I was able to convince my employer to pay for me to attend either > RailsConf or RubyCon or Rails Edge (even though we're a .Net shop with > no plans to deploy Rails anytime soon). Have any of you attended any > of them and can would you suggest attending one? I attended all three. It really de

Re: [Radiant] Mental Branch Revision?

2007-01-18 Thread Marty Haught
> The commits tend to be well tested if they affect normal operations, so it's > pretty safe to use the current revision. Mental automatically uses Edge > Rails as an svn:external when you checkout. > > Sean > p.s. www.kckcc.edu is running the latest revision of mental &

[Radiant] Mental Branch Revision?

2007-01-17 Thread Marty Haught
Hi Guys, I'm going to be starting a new site in Radiant (have two others on 0.5.2 already) and wanted to work with mental. Should I just take the current revision or is there a specific one I should target? Also, does mental require 1.2/edge? Cheers, Marty __

Re: [Radiant] POLL: Upgrading Unpacked Radiant Applications

2007-01-15 Thread Marty Haught
1. Gem 2. No 3. No ___ Radiant mailing list Post: Radiant@lists.radiantcms.org Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/ Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Re: [Radiant] 503 on Radiant site

2007-01-12 Thread Marty Haught
Virtual servers are quite affordable. I have my sites on a xen virtual server at http://www.slicehost.com/. The small slice is $20/mo. Cheers, Marty On 1/12/07, Sean Cribbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ah, yes. It would be nice to have mongrel_cluster instead of a poor > single-instance sit

Re: [Radiant] Copying a page

2006-11-01 Thread Marty Haught
> Mmm, that's an interesting thought. So when you create a new page it > would have blank parts defined for every one of it's parent's parts? You > could then delete them or add others, but it would inherit it's parent's > parts at creation time? I would think a 'clone' page would be more useful.