Re: [Radiant] First, last and each in differing orders

2006-07-13 Thread John W. Long
Andrew Hodgkinson wrote: > John W. Long wrote: > >> Please submit a ticket and associate it with the next release. > > OK, done (I assume "0.6" is the next release...). Yup. Though I think we may be due for a 0.5.1 release next week. It looks like I failed to include the .htaccess file in 0.5.0

Re: [Radiant] First, last and each in differing orders

2006-07-13 Thread Andrew Hodgkinson
John W. Long wrote: > Please submit a ticket and associate it with the next release. OK, done (I assume "0.6" is the next release...). >> A cool future feature would allow "by" and "status" selectors on the >> :first and :last tags, assuming they're not already supported. > > Yah, a status att

Re: [Radiant] First, last and each in differing orders

2006-07-13 Thread John W. Long
Andrew Hodgkinson wrote: > Is it a bug or intentional that and > disagree with about the first and last child by > default in Radiant 0.50? Ug. That would be a bug. :-) I've been meaning to rewrite these tags to simply call out to children each with `limit="1"`, but haven't gotten around to

[Radiant] First, last and each in differing orders

2006-07-12 Thread Andrew Hodgkinson
Is it a bug or intentional that and disagree with about the first and last child by default in Radiant 0.50? The :first and :last tags appear to return the same thing shown in the list of pages; that is, children sorted in alphabetical order by page title, irrespective of order of page crea