[Radiant] i188n: Translation of the back end sections

2009-11-23 Thread Eugen Funk
Hello guys, i installed radiant some time ago and now i was wondering if there is already some development in progress for translating the backend into some specific language? As i can seee on github right now, there is now folder "config/locales" which might be used. So by the way, is someone cont

Re: [Radiant] (no subject)

2009-11-23 Thread banane
You could send the "escape html" tag to the textarea object, or wrap it before updating and inserting into the model. I do remember a setting for determining what filters are available- perhaps in settings (9) or in the environment variable? Do a search on the directory for "textile" and you'll pr

Re: [Radiant] aggreate archive

2009-11-23 Thread Jim Gay
It's not implemented. It may be a bit confusing, but the scope for aggregate:archive:children is created entirely separately than the scope for children (they are 2 separate methods). Parts of this extension will be pulled into the core at some point, so we should be able to avoid expectations of

Re: [Radiant] aggreate archive

2009-11-23 Thread Steven Southard
Not sure why if_first doesn't work here but using back_door I was able to create a simple inline work around. Thanks, Steven On Nov 23, 2009, at 1:33 PM, Steven Southard wrote: > Do you know any reason this doesn't work: > > > > > > ... > > > The date works fine without the if_first yet

[Radiant] (no subject)

2009-11-23 Thread Cliff
Is there a setting or an existing extension that locks down which filters are available to users? In one scenario, I've installed the FckEditor extension is installed and FckEditor is customized to meet the team's needs. I'd like to make this the required filter for standard users when creatin

Re: [Radiant] aggreate archive

2009-11-23 Thread Steven Southard
Do you know any reason this doesn't work: ... The date works fine without the if_first yet it is repeated many times. If I add the if_first I just get no date at all. On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Jim Gay wrote: > With your code: > The current page scope for the tag is the current p

Re: [Radiant] aggreate archive

2009-11-23 Thread Steven Southard
My initial understanding of how these pages would be organized turned out to be slightly false. It seems to be working fine now. Thanks for your help. Steven On Nov 23, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Jim Gay wrote: > With your code: > The current page scope for the tag is the current page. > You'd

Re: [Radiant] aggreate archive

2009-11-23 Thread Jim Gay
With your code: The current page scope for the tag is the current page. You'd need: Or: Here are the children ...more code... This would change the scope to each of the children and iterate through them. I'm sure you've just been staring at it too long ;-) On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Stev

Re: [Radiant] aggreate archive

2009-11-23 Thread Steven Southard
Okay a little closer. I'm using this on a aggregated archive day: So on http://localhost:3000/blog-archives/2009/11/12 I was expecting the articles written on a given day but I only get the archive page with the date I made the archive page. Also Recursion error: already rende

[Radiant] Develop new project in Radiant 0.8.1, or 0.9?

2009-11-23 Thread Asfand Yar Qazi
Hi, Should any new projects be developed in Radiant 0.8.1 , considering all extensions are written for it? Or can I assume they will be updated fairly quickly to 0.9, and start developing for the 0.9 release? If I were to develop any projects in 0.8, how difficult would it be to port them to 0.9

Re: [Radiant] Radiant capabilities

2009-11-23 Thread Asfand Yar Qazi
2009/11/23 Anton Aylward : > > Its not about "maturity".  Its about what people have chosen to develop. > One reason for Radiant was that it simply headed in a different > driection from Joomla ... or Silverlight. > > But RoR and Radius makes Radiant very easy to alter. > I agree. In particular I

Re: [Radiant] Radiant capabilities

2009-11-23 Thread Asfand Yar Qazi
2009/11/23 Anton Aylward : > And I don't know where you get off slagging the excellent work by the > various contributors to Radiant by implying its not as capable of being > a forum engine as a blogging engine. And yes, there are plugins to > handle video too. Sorry about that, I didn't mean to

Re: [Radiant] Radiant capabilities

2009-11-23 Thread Anton Aylward
Asfand Yar Qazi said the following on 11/23/2009 07:17 AM: > 2009/11/22 Anton Aylward : >> Asfand Yar Qazi said the following on 11/22/2009 10:10 AM: >>> 2009/11/21 Anton Aylward : > >> I'm a strong believer in simplification, and one of the axioms is "Each >> Thing Does One Thing and Only One Thi

Re: [Radiant] aggreate archive

2009-11-23 Thread Jim Gay
Pull the latest. I just fixed that. On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 1:31 AM, Steven Southard wrote: > Yes, I was trying it with a normal page and also I re-installed the > extension and I got a few more options which make it more possible.  I > think I understand it a bit better, yet I still don't have i

Re: [Radiant] Radiant capabilities

2009-11-23 Thread Asfand Yar Qazi
2009/11/22 Anton Aylward : > Asfand Yar Qazi said the following on 11/22/2009 10:10 AM: >> 2009/11/21 Anton Aylward : > I'm a strong believer in simplification, and one of the axioms is "Each > Thing Does One Thing and Only One Thing".  Overloading a single engine > to do all you want sounds like