This seems like it would work great and be really helpful. For some
reason it doesn't output anything. Do I have it wrong or will find
not work inside aggregation or something?
...
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: htt
> DUH!
>
> I'm not sure I agree.
> Marking an existing page as 404 'cos its been taken out of service,
> perhaps for legal reasons, seems reasonable, and its also reasonable
> that its children need not be taken out of service.
>
> This is no different, logically, from a parent page that is taken
John Long said the following on 12/01/2009 01:05 PM:
> This is not a bug. A 404 page is not intended to have children. I'd
> recommend that you include some javascript that automatically
> redirects to your home page.
DUH!
I'm not sure I agree.
Marking an existing page as 404 'cos its been taken
2009/12/1 Sean Cribbs
> I've run into this before with the archive index pages. The unexpected
> thing is that it does match the url, because the plain url of the
> archive index page is something like:
>
> /news/2009/10/31/%b-%y-archives
>
Ah-ha. Thanks, that gave me enough info to solve it. T
This is not a bug. A 404 page is not intended to have children. I'd
recommend that you include some javascript that automatically
redirects to your home page.
--John
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Anton Aylward wrote:
> Endnotes are an alternative to footnotes.
> Long footnotes can intrude int
Arthur,
Thanks for the pointer, page-group-permissions sounds perfect. I'm a
little worried that it hasn't been updated in a long time, but I'll
give it a shot in the next few days.
- Jeff
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Arthur Gunn wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> That depends, whether you're wanting
2009/11/30 Mamed Mamedov :
> It is only my opinion, thank you for reading it till the end ;)
no problem - I'm already starting to develop in 0.8.1, it's just that
the 0.9 UI is soo much prettier, and I'm a sucker for aesthetics ;)
___
Radiant mailing
> Thanks Sean. When you say "as of the current version", you mean 0.8.1 rather
> than the RC, right? I am using 0.8.1 and doing a hard refresh definitely
> doesn't clear the cache properly. In fact, the behaviour can get quite
> strange: repeated hard-refreshes can deliver any one of several revis
Charles Roper wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've got a problem with using in a layout for a news (Archive)
> page. I am trying to display a snippet based on the URL. Here's the bit of
> my layout in question:
>
>
>
>
>
> So, in other words, if we're on a news article page (if
2009/11/30 Sean Cribbs
> That seems correct. I'm not sure about their other infrastructure, but
> as of the current version, doing a hard-refresh in your browser will
> cause the page to be purged from the cache as well.
>
Thanks Sean. When you say "as of the current version", you mean 0.8.1 ra
Hey all,
I've got a problem with using in a layout for a news (Archive)
page. I am trying to display a snippet based on the URL. Here's the bit of
my layout in question:
So, in other words, if we're on a news article page (if there is any
character present after the
11 matches
Mail list logo
