Jay Levitt wrote:
Mohit Sindhwani wrote:
Jay Levitt wrote:
John Toups wrote:
I want to agree with Eric regarding the Summer Reboot.
And I keep poking my nose into Radiant every few weeks, but it's
slow going. I saw one very, very complicated thread, where just the
*answer* to "if I figure
Spring Documentation Continuum. I like it!
Sean
John W. Long wrote:
Speaking of the Summer Reboot, maybe it would be good to fold it into
the Radiant Handbook now and start the Spring Documentation Continuum.
After all, it's hardly Summer anymore, and small iterations are good.
Just my 2 cen
Speaking of the Summer Reboot, maybe it would be good to fold it into
the Radiant Handbook now and start the Spring Documentation Continuum.
After all, it's hardly Summer anymore, and small iterations are good.
Just my 2 cents. :-)
And thanks to everyone who has contributed to the documentat
Jay Levitt wrote:
John Toups wrote:
I want to agree with Eric regarding the Summer Reboot.
And I keep poking my nose into Radiant every few weeks, but it's slow
going. I saw one very, very complicated thread, where just the
*answer* to "if I figure something out, where should I post the
an
John Toups wrote:
I want to agree with Eric regarding the Summer Reboot.
And I keep poking my nose into Radiant every few weeks, but it's slow going.
I saw one very, very complicated thread, where just the *answer* to "if I
figure something out, where should I post the answer?" ran to half a
I want to agree with Eric regarding the Summer Reboot. I started
using Radiant last week, before volunteering at the sprint to write
documentation for new users. At that point, I was directed to the
Summer Reboot, to start updating those pages. I hope to do a lot more
work in them over t
Just wanted to chip in one piece of constructive (I hope) criticism. I'm
still getting started using Radiant. I've found the documentation
sufficient - in fact, it's generally quite good for a relatively new
open-source project of its scope.
That said, I notice a lot of people on the mailing lis
Anton J Aylward wrote:
Radiant has great potential, but, apart from a few people, Sean and
Chris being the most outstanding, the Geeks rule. The code may be great
but the usability sucks. The READMEs are sparse, the installation
instructions missing and the examples for use non-existent or con
I'd been wondering if there was a better way to categorise blog entries
than the failed 'related content' that I'd recently commented on and
the complicated - to my eyes at least - way that Sean described.
I found the 'articles' plug-in and tried that.
Well, for a start, it failed:
Processing A
