Mark Glossop wrote:
It does - thanks very much for your clear comments, and also for Jim's
questions. The application vs. framework analogy was particularly
useful. Thanks for taking the time.
Jim, I haven't answered your questions since Mohit's answer clarifies a lot
for me, and much of my
Mark Glossop wrote:
Jim, I haven't answered your questions since Mohit's answer clarifies a lot
for me, and much of my opinions were/are based on little more than gut feel
and a lot of IT experience. Were I to give any answers, they likely wouldn't
say more than I'd like it to be less surprising
My apologies for not responding to this thread sooner. Mohit and Jim
already touched on reasons why Radiant is kind of an all-in-one package
but I want to reiterate and clarify some of those.
* Reduces compatibility issues - libraries will work as intended.
* Assists with shared-hosting
Jim Gay wrote:
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Mark Glossop wrote:
On 26/02/09 05:58, somebody called Mark Glossop
(li...@cueballcentral.com)
wrote this:
Hi all - first time poster here [didn't want to hijack the thread about
Dreamhost, so started a new one...I have a very specific question,
Jim Gay wrote:
On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:22 PM, Mark Glossop wrote:
On 26/02/09 05:58, somebody called Mark Glossop
(li...@cueballcentral.com)
wrote this:
Evidently that's not enough of a reason for me to _not_ use it,
but the question remains:
Why is Radiant delivered as a gem with all the
My apologies that my previous mail went out twice.
Mohit.
___
Radiant mailing list
Post: Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
On 27/02/09 13:02, somebody called Mohit Sindhwani (t...@onghu.com) wrote
this:
[snip]
Sorry to nag, but - anyone? Bueller?
In case this was somehow regarded as trollbait, I'm asking this as a
legitimate query...it really is quite important for me to know, and
time is
a factor for me ATM.
