Hi,
> Why not just revert it? Verison 111 looks relatively clean.
Perhaps so as to not wipe out valid ones written since?
Being rubyists though, the idea of doing computer work manually does
not appeal much.
Following on from Michael's idea of checking for /admin, I have
written a spam-link
Why not just revert it? Verison 111 looks relatively clean.
You can revert on github right?
michael starke wrote:
> I just started the splitting, and checked some 5 pages to be spam or
> not. I marked them as "spam?" and moved the ones i identified as valid
> radiant ones to the top one (i us
I just started the splitting, and checked some 5 pages to be spam or
not. I marked them as "spam?" and moved the ones i identified as valid
radiant ones to the top one (i used the /admin url to test for
radiant, so it's probably not very good for testing every page ;) )
perhaps i find the ti
http://wiki.github.com/radiant/radiant/radiant-users has pretty much
been ruined by a spammer. after bringing it to the attention of github
they banned the user but all the spam they left is still there. if you
have a valid listing on that page perhaps you could move it to another
list above the cu
