[Radiant] Content parts for any model?

2010-12-06 Thread Christian Aust
Hi all, I'm working on two Radiant projects which need a custom model that has_many parts just like Page does. I used to basically copy-paste stuff from the original radiant views to resemble the look&feel within the views of my model. Is there a more standard way to reuse the tabbed view of pa

Re: [Radiant] Content parts for any model?

2010-12-06 Thread Jim Gay
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Christian Aust wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm working on two Radiant projects which need a custom model that has_many > parts just like Page does. I used to basically copy-paste stuff from the > original radiant views to resemble the look&feel within the views of my >

[Radiant] I'm confused...

2010-12-06 Thread Marc
Hi All, If I have a site with a number of extensions installed and I had to drop the database and want to reinitialise it what are the steps? I've tried rake production db:bootstrap --trace which fails due to missing columns that are part of various extensions. I've tried rake production db

Re: [Radiant] I'm confused...

2010-12-06 Thread Jim Gay
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Marc wrote: > Hi All, > > If I have a site with a number of extensions installed and I had to > drop the database and want to reinitialise it what are the steps? > > I've tried >  rake production db:bootstrap --trace > > which fails due to missing columns that are p

[Radiant] Re: I'm confused...

2010-12-06 Thread Marc
Thanks Jim! rake production db:migrate:extensions didn't seem to get the job done - I think there is a dependancy between some of the extensions (copy_move, dashboard, page_preview, paperclipped, ray, reorder, settings, sns, sns_minifier). Funny enough if I do foreach extension (*) # in vendor/e

Re: [Radiant] Re: I'm confused...

2010-12-06 Thread Jim Gay
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marc wrote: > Thanks Jim! > > rake production db:migrate:extensions > > didn't seem to get the job done - I think there is a dependancy > between some of the extensions (copy_move, dashboard, page_preview, > paperclipped, ray, reorder, settings, sns, sns_minifier).

Re: [Radiant] editing page ui's

2010-12-06 Thread Jim Gay
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:55 AM, bradley.t.her...@gmail.com wrote: > I followed a tutorial at > http://blazingcloud.net/2009/11/22/radiant-cms-custom-user-permissions/ > to help me figure out how to modify the admin UI through an extensions > like so: > > admin.page.index.add :node, > 'remove_col

Re: [Radiant] Default snippets filter

2010-12-06 Thread Jim Gay
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Sam Whited wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Does anyone know if there is an option to set the default filter for > snippets in Radiant 0.9.0? > > I've got my default pages filter set ('defaults.page.filter') so I > thought there might be

Re: [Radiant] tagging extension w/ autocomplete

2010-12-06 Thread Jim Gay
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:12 PM, bradley.t.her...@gmail.com wrote: > Working on updating spanners taggable extension with auto-complete. > It's got basic functionality now but needs updated to accept and auto- > complete multiple tags.  If anyone wants to use it or help out it's > here https://gith

[Radiant] Re: tagging extension w/ autocomplete

2010-12-06 Thread Brad Herman
Will do... newer to github so im not fully up on best practices. Thanks :) Bradley Herman | iGoDigital® Personalized Product Recommendation Software | Cell 317.331.9718 l Office 888.496.2446x716 www.igodigital.com On Monday, December 6, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Jim Gay wrote: > On Thu, Dec 2, 20

Re: [Radiant] Default snippets filter

2010-12-06 Thread Sam Whited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/6/2010 22:35, Jim Gay wrote: >> A well-tested patch would be applied, for sure. Or, if you can't do >> that, make an issue for it https://github.com/radiant/radiant/issues How about something like this? It appears to be working for me and is no

Re: [Radiant] Default snippets filter

2010-12-06 Thread Sam Whited
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Darn, that's embarrassing. Here's the file. On 12/7/2010 01:23, Sam Whited wrote: > > On 12/6/2010 22:35, Jim Gay wrote: >>> A well-tested patch would be applied, for sure. Or, if you can't do >>> that, make an issue for it https://github.com/radiant