Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza

2020-02-28 Thread Johnson, Neil M
Thanks! -- Neil Johnson 319 384-0938 neil-john...@uiowa.edu From: radiator on behalf of Heikki Vatiainen Date: Thursday, February 27, 2020 at 4:46 AM To: "radiator@lists.open.com.au" Subject: [External] Re: [RADIATOR] Client definition stanza On 26.2.2020

Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza

2020-02-27 Thread Johnson, Neil M
0 >> >> >> That seems to work. >> >> -- >> Neil Johnson >> 319 384-0938 >> neil-john...@uiowa.edu >> >> >> From: radiator on behalf of Neil >> Johnson >> Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 12

Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza

2020-02-26 Thread Hugh Irvine
ts statement it says: > “You can have any number of IdenticalClients lines” > > -Neil > > -- > Neil Johnson > 319 384-0938 > neil-john...@uiowa.edu > > > From: radiator on behalf of Neil Johnson > > Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 12:2

Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza

2020-02-26 Thread Johnson, Neil M
From: radiator on behalf of Neil Johnson Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 12:21 PM To: Hugh Irvine Cc: "radiator@lists.open.com.au" Subject: Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza Additional data point, if I use IPv4 addresses it works fine. -Neil -- Neil Johnson 3

Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza

2020-02-26 Thread Johnson, Neil M
Additional data point, if I use IPv4 addresses it works fine. -Neil -- Neil Johnson 319 384-0938 neil-john...@uiowa.edu From: Neil Johnson Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 12:04 PM To: Hugh Irvine Cc: "radiator@lists.open.com.au" Subject: Re: [External]

Re: [RADIATOR] [External] Re: Client definition stanza

2020-02-26 Thread Johnson, Neil M
Hugh, I changed the stanza as requested: IdenticalClients 172.24.145.0/24, fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::/64, fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6600::/64 Identifier LC_NET_Clients Secret DupInterval 0 Same results. Connections from fd9a:2c75:7d0c:6400::1a are reported as from an unknown client, but