Hello Hugh,
Now I can start Radaitor Service by
re-setting ODBC System DSN . But the problem still occure when I use
Radmin. Error Message below is shown when I use web-browser to open
Radmin
ErrorA
serious error has occurred: Could not connect to SQL database
dbi:ODBC:Radmin: [Microso
>From what I have seen with my own (meager) experiments with Perl threading,
it appears to behave radically different on different OSes, presumably
because every OS treats threading differently.
This may be the reason for the non-production-quality aspect.
Chris
> From: Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROT
Hello Damir -
Mike and I have discussed this issue at length over a long period of time,
and indeed the topic has also been discussed on the mailing list several
times as well.
Basically, it is our intention to extend Radiator to use multi-threading so
that each request runs in a separate th
Hi Frank -
Please see my other mail on this topic.
Basically we would like you to test this with Radiator 3.0, and in the
meantime just kill and restart Radiator so it recreates everything from
scratch.
thanks
Hugh
On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:40, Frank Danielson wrote:
> We're using a Radiator
Hello Peter, Hello Frank -
I sent the results of my testing here to Peter yesterday, mentioning that I
had not been able to reproduce his problem, although I had discovered another
bug in the AuthLog FILE clause (the full path was not being created).
At this stage we would like to hold off on
Frank Danielson wrote:
> We're using a Radiator with Authby ROUNDROBIN to forward requests out to the
> other servers. The problem that I am running in to is that if I do a kill
> -HUP to get Radiator to reread the config file it doesn't seem to use the
> new directives in the config file and kee
We're using a
Radiator with Authby ROUNDROBIN to forward requests out to the other
servers. The problem that I am running in to is that if I do a kill -HUP to get
Radiator to reread the config file it doesn't seem to use the new
directives in the config file and keeps forwarding requests to
Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello Damir -
>
> As always, many thanks for your very valuable contributions.
>
> Mike will apply the fixes for the next release.
My coleagues & I are discussing an interesting idea. Would it
be possible to handle slow AuthRADIUS proxy requests in a s