--On mardi 24 juin 2003 09:26 +1000 Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
thanks for the full log.
Looks like Radiator is not seeing a completed client hello from your client:
its still waiting for the client hello to be closed off.
This is very puzzling: your client is
Hello Jerome,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:32 pm, Jerome Fleury wrote:
--On mardi 24 juin 2003 09:26 +1000 Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
thanks for the full log.
Looks like Radiator is not seeing a completed client hello from your
client: its still waiting for the
Hello Jerome,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:32 pm, Jerome Fleury wrote:
--On mardi 24 juin 2003 09:26 +1000 Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
thanks for the full log.
Looks like Radiator is not seeing a completed client hello from your
client: its still waiting for the
Title: Message
Dear Sirs,We are using Radiator as a Radius Proxy server
between our Cisco 5300 Access-Servers and CiscoSecure CSU (2.3.6.1) AAA server
in authenticating users for several network services, but mainly for ppp
dialup connection.Our dialup users have per-user
The Radiator documentation states that I can store RADIUS attributes
in LDAP, and retrieve them with AuthAttrDef or similar methods. But
the documentation doesn't discuss what schema to use, or how those
attributes should be stored so that Radiator can find them.
How are other people doing
--On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 09:58:28 PM +1000 Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jerome,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:32 pm, Jerome Fleury wrote:
--On mardi 24 juin 2003 09:26 +1000 Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jeremy,
thanks for the full log.
Looks like
Hi Matt,
We are storing user information in LDAP. Below is the authby clause we
use. To add radius attributes to the ldap entry for the user you simply
need to have them in the entry for the user ( same level in our case ).
We retrieve static ip addresses for example using the
Has
any additional information become available on this
I have
requested that our people, restrict their use of radar, until further
notice
Cheers
Chris.
-Original Message-From: Hugh Irvine
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, 20 June 2003 9:57
AMTo: Dave
Hello Chris -
I have asked both Dave and Herman for further details and I'm awaiting their replies.
Have you had any problems or is this just a precaution?
We have never seen this reported previously so if you have been using Radar successfully until now I doubt that you are likely to have any
Hello Jerome,
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 01:37 am, Jerome Fleury wrote:
--On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 09:58:28 PM +1000 Mike McCauley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jerome,
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:32 pm, Jerome Fleury wrote:
--On mardi 24 juin 2003 09:26 +1000 Mike McCauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I wonder up to what point you are able to deal with such a log's? We have at
the moment around 5.5M records per month in our DSL customers log and to
match that to a NetFlow log about 114TB (that's their generated traffic)...
huhh How far this kind a solution scales? Anyway, we give
11 matches
Mail list logo