Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and Load Balancer

On 27/07/16 19:32, Robert Blayzor wrote: > DSR load balancing assumes the real servers know about the load balanced VIP > and is generally configured on a loopback. > > The problem with this I think is that Radiator responds with a source address > of where the packet leaves. (at least that’s

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and Load Balancer

DSR load balancing assumes the real servers know about the load balanced VIP and is generally configured on a loopback. The problem with this I think is that Radiator responds with a source address of where the packet leaves. (at least that’s been my experience). Most clients will probably

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and Load Balancer

Thanks Shaun. This is good reading. Barry On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:38 AM, shaun gibson wrote: > On 27/07/2016 18:14, Barry Ard wrote: > > > We are running into some challenges configuring a new environment for > > Eduroam. > > > > Recently we have moved away from 2 servers

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and Load Balancer

On 27/07/2016 18:14, Barry Ard wrote: > We are running into some challenges configuring a new environment for > Eduroam. > > Recently we have moved away from 2 servers running multiple radiator > processes to a multiple VMs behind an F5 load balancer. This has been > working well for our

[RADIATOR] Radiator and Load Balancer

We are running into some challenges configuring a new environment for Eduroam. Recently we have moved away from 2 servers running multiple radiator processes to a multiple VMs behind an F5 load balancer. This has been working well for our wireless infrastructure but has been posing challenges as