RE: (RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address

2002-01-04 Thread Robert Blayzor
ginal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike McCauley > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 7:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address > > > > > -- Forwarded Message -- > > Subj

(RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address

2002-01-04 Thread Mike McCauley
-- Forwarded Message -- Subject: BOUNCE [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Non-member submission from ["Alex Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 16:10:11 -0600 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 4 16:10:10 2002 Received: from ncni

Re: (RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address = 203.63.154.1

2000-12-19 Thread Hugh Irvine
Hello Tim - At 13:08 +1000 19/12/00, Tim McCullagh wrote: >Hi > >Can anyone tell me where the NAS-IP-Address 203.63.154.1 is referenced apart >from in the portlist file. >I have commented it out in the portlist file and it still keeps coming up >when I try and test radiator. > Its the default a

(RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address = 203.63.154.1

2000-12-18 Thread Tim McCullagh
Hi Can anyone tell me where the NAS-IP-Address 203.63.154.1 is referenced apart from in the portlist file. I have commented it out in the portlist file and it still keeps coming up when I try and test radiator. TIA Tim === Archive at http://www.starport.net/~radiator/ Announcements on [EMAIL

Re: (RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address

1999-05-27 Thread Mike McCauley
Hi Tom, On May 27, 11:43am, tom wrote: > Subject: (RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address > > Hi all, > > Is it possible to us "hostname" instead of using > IP addresses? No. The actual data in the NAS-IP-Address is an IP address. It might be possible to make a PreHandlerHook t

(RADIATOR) NAS-IP-Address

1999-05-27 Thread tom
Hi all, Is it possible to us "hostname" instead of using IP addresses? Like joe Auth-type = System, NAS-IP-Address = /^portmaster[0-9]/ Or is there a patch or hack to allow NAS-Hostname. Regards, Tom === Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/ To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PRO