Seeing this thread, I was reminded that I had once submitted a desired patch,
but not sure it was ever implemented (?).
http://www.open.com.au/pipermail/radiator/2007-June/014065.html
It was to resolve my issue with Clients (routers) with multiple A records and
the fact that Client's addresses
On Saturday, December 18, 2010 03:18:19 am Christian Kratzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Leigh Porter wrote:
> > I tried these methods and none of them really worked effectively against
> > a defective LDAP server. The best solution I found was a decent load
> > balancer with LDAP serve
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Leigh Porter wrote:
> I tried these methods and none of them really worked effectively against a
> defective LDAP server. The best solution I found was a decent load balancer
> with LDAP server availability testing..
we have a customer setup that successfully uses autb
I tried these methods and none of them really worked effectively against a
defective LDAP server. The best solution I found was a decent load balancer
with LDAP server availability testing..
--
Leigh
On 17 Dec 2010, at 22:24, Heikki Vatiainen wrote:
> On 12/17/2010 11:29 PM, Christian Kratze
On 12/17/2010 11:29 PM, Christian Kratzer wrote:
>> one more quick question. What is the behavior of AuthBy LDAP2 with a
>> round-robin DNS entry (multiple A records for the RR)? If I'd like
>> failover behavior, will a single Host declaration with a round-robin
>> record be enough, or do I need
Hi,
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Andrew Clark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one more quick question. What is the behavior of AuthBy LDAP2 with a
> round-robin DNS entry (multiple A records for the RR)? If I'd like
> failover behavior, will a single Host declaration with a round-robin
> record be enough, or do I nee
Hi,
one more quick question. What is the behavior of AuthBy LDAP2 with a
round-robin DNS entry (multiple A records for the RR)? If I'd like
failover behavior, will a single Host declaration with a round-robin
record be enough, or do I need to list out each individual LDAP
server?
Load-balancing