Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-15 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > 1.)Radiator has to fix AuthRADSEC. The user has to choose to use >extended-Ids in the Proxy-State Attribut if the upstream proxy >will handle this. By default it should use 8 Bit Identifiers. > > 2.)radsecproxy has to fix the self generated Access-Rejects. >I

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-15 Thread Karl Gaissmaier
Hi, Am 15.07.2013 09:15, schrieb a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk: > Hi, > >> 1272017248108...@wlan.mnc001.mcc262.3gppnetwork.org > > 3gppnetwork realms are invalid. ..just like hotmail, gmail, yahoo etc - > until a notice comes from eduroam stating that these realms now have agreed > relationship, they ar

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-15 Thread Stefan Winter
Hi, > status-server musnt be proxiedits only for the first-hop check of > a remote proxy and not the end target - but that surely isnt the issue? > a Status-Server message is easy to deal with - you just send something back > to show you are alive - RADIATOR has been sending a basic statts pag

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-15 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > 1272017248108...@wlan.mnc001.mcc262.3gppnetwork.org 3gppnetwork realms are invalid. ..just like hotmail, gmail, yahoo etc - until a notice comes from eduroam stating that these realms now have agreed relationship, they are public realms and not within the private scheme of eduroam. > RF

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-14 Thread Karl Gaissmaier
Hi Alex, hi radiator team, Am 14.07.2013 19:48, schrieb Alan Buxey: > Hi > > As an end site you really shouldn't be sending invalid realms to your > national proxy... but there does seem to be something odd gong on here. I sent it to test this situation. As an eduroam ServiceProvider I don't know

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-14 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi As an end site you really shouldn't be sending invalid realms to your national proxy... but there does seem to be something odd gong on here. . their system should be just sending back a straight access reject. If radsecproxy doesn't like extended proxy id (or the config doesn't allow it )

Re: [RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-14 Thread Karl Gaissmaier
Am 14.07.2013 17:28, schrieb Karl Gaissmaier: ... > Worse, it seems that buggy clients with unroutable @Realms trigger > answers with proxy-state stripped. So I get NoreplyTimeouts for > any buggy client request and my upstream connections break away. > > Seems that all german @Realms in eduroam u

[RADIATOR] Radiator and radsecproxy, status-server and failover algo, one step forward

2013-07-14 Thread Karl Gaissmaier
Hi radiator team, now I proved my suspicion, that the upstream radsecproxy is stripping the radiator proxy-state, at least in status-server requests. I used monkey patching in AuthBy RADSEC, just quick and dirty to get the result (you know, it's sunday): > Sun Jul 14 16:56:43 2013 009313: DEBUG: