On 04/17/2013 12:35 AM, Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automatis wrote:
>> If you get it after 'Add', what are you using as 'Valid from' and 'Valid
>> to' values? A quick check shows Perl's timelocal will not accept dates
>> after Jan 2038 if the Perl version is less than 5.12
>
> That makes sense. I
49 00 64
> F - +31 (0)50 549 00 71
> E - akalfster...@aksi.nl
> W - www.aksi.nl
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [RADIATOR] Re-2: Adding a user through radmin gives a CGI Error
> (16-apr-2013 7:12)
> From:Heikki Vatiainen
> To: ak
On 04/15/2013 07:09 PM, Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automatis wrote:
> The only thing IIS logs is a HTTP error 502:
Hello Adwim,
HTTP error 502 is 'Bad gateway'. Do you have a web proxy between
yourself and the server that runs Radiator?
> 2013-04-12 06:34:45 W3SVC1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx POST /Scripts/R
Thanks, Adwim, however I was really talking about Vasco tokens using the native
Digipass protocol (as implemented in AuthBy SQLDIGIPASS). I realise that OATH
(HOTP/TOTP) would be another possible approach though.
Regards
roy
- Original Message -
From: "Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automat
On 05/12/2011 01:39 PM, Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automatisering bv wrote:
Albert,
thanks for providing the screenshot and details.
Looks like the digipass ppms are not complete in this release. I will
send you a separate email with working files from a previous Radiator
version and we will see t
On 05/11/2011 10:25 PM, Adwim Kalfsterman - AKSI Automatisering bv wrote:
Helo Adwim,
> I've setup a new server, because I was testing it on a Windows Server 2008 R2
> server and the authen-digipass.ppd ppm modules won't install on that platform.
Thanks for reporting this.
> I've now setup a 3
We are actually running the Avaya 2.2.4 code on our Proxim2000 APs..
Bret
Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hmm maybe is problem in too new firmware in my units.
I tell Proxim technicians let they try also test latest firmware 2.3.1
on their
office when 2.2.2 have a working, I dont want to spend time by
tryi
Hmm maybe is problem in too new firmware in my units.
I tell Proxim technicians let they try also test latest firmware 2.3.1
on their
office when 2.2.2 have a working, I dont want to spend time by
trying old Proxim firmware, latest firmware should always work best,
its not my problem, I will wait
We have Proxim AP2000s working with PEAP in a limited area. It does
work with Radiator, it just a pain.
Bret
Mike McCauley wrote:
Helo Pavel,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:50 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Today I got answer from technicians from Proxim, they are using
in own office AP-2000 fw v.2.2.2 an
Helo Pavel,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:50 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
> Today I got answer from technicians from Proxim, they are using
> in own office AP-2000 fw v.2.2.2 and 2.1.3 with EAP-PEAP without problems.
> But are not using Radiator radius because "is not RFC 2285/2866 compliant".
2285 is 'Bench
Today I got answer from technicians from Proxim, they are using
in own office AP-2000 fw v.2.2.2 and 2.1.3 with EAP-PEAP without problems.
But are not using Radiator radius because "is not RFC 2285/2866 compliant".
Has a Radiator some RFC compliance problem? And can it be a cause?
P.
Pavel Paprok
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to
Bret Jordan wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hall
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying
Hello Pavel,
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:01 am, Pavel Paprok wrote:
> Mike McCauley wrote:
> >Hello Pavel,
> >
> >On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
> >>Mike McCauley wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I am trying to get work wifi acce
Mike McCauley wrote:
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 10:40 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Mike McCauley wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:42 pm, Pavel Paprok wrote:
Hallo,
I am trying to get work wifi access point Orinoco/Proxim AP-2000 with
802.1x EAP/PEAP user auth by Radiator:
- Radiator
Hugh,
I HAVE JUST FIXED THE PROBLEM
I AM STILL SENDING THIS EMAIL INCASE ANYONE ELSE RUNS INTO THE SAME PROBLEM
BELOW IS A FIX FOR THE PROBLEM
We are using Radius Interim Packets (Live Packets),
Looking through the logs I have found the problem why it was failing but it
still doesnt solve my c
ence.local with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 16:21:27 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Frank Danielson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Automatically Proxing of accouting/authen
Hello Tony -
I think you may need to set up two Handlers, and extend the
RADSQLRADIUS table (or use two) so you have both authentication and
accounting targets. Then you will need to run a second instance of
Radiator on this same host to deal with the local authentication.
The configuration fi
L PROTECTED]>
To: "Nico de Groot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Radiator on Windows 2000 AuthbyNT hangs
(addition)
>
> Hello Nico -
>
> Thanks for sending the debug informatio
69.131.8
Sat Feb 22 19:11:41 2003: DEBUG: Handling request with Handler
'Realm=ktu.nl'
Sat Feb 22 19:11:41 2003: DEBUG: Rewrote user name to ndegroot
Sat Feb 22 19:11:41 2003: DEBUG: Deleting session for [EMAIL PROTECTED],
195.169.131.8,
Sat Feb 22 19:11:41 2003: DEBUG: Handling with Radius::Au
;877880070"
Service-Type = Framed-User
NAS-IP-Address = 195.169.131.8
Sat Feb 22 19:11:41 2003: DEBUG: Handling request with Handler
'Realm=ktu.nl'
Sat Feb 22 19:11:41 2003: DEBUG: Rewrote user name to ndegroot
Sat Feb 22 19:11:41 2003: DEBUG: Deleting session for [EMAIL PR
Hello Nico -
Thanks for keeping us up to date with your testing.
It would be very helpful to see a copy of your configuration file (no
secrets), together with a more complete trace 4 debug showing what is
going on with multiple requests and responses.
You should use a packet sniffer to check
Hi Hugh,
As always you have been a Hugh help :-)
BTW I was trying to customise the AcctSQLStatement and get the
Acct-Session-Time to be logged
in minutes rather than seconds. I have tried various ways of dividing the
Acct-Session-Time by 60 but
with no luck (e.g., %{Acct-Session-Time}/60 :-)
Fina
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:45 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: website access / ipass authentication
>
> Hello Tunde -
>
> I am afraid I can't help you with questions about "service" as I don't
> use it.
Hello Tunde -
I am afraid I can't help you with questions about "service" as I don't
use it.
I generally use the "restartWrapper" utility included in the "goodies"
directory.
regards
Hugh
On Monday, Jan 13, 2003, at 23:38 Australia/Melbourne, Ayotunde Itayemi
wrote:
Hi Hugh,
OK. I have
Hello Matthew -
I think you will find that MD5 is included in all recent versions of
Perl.
regards
Hugh
On Saturday, Jan 11, 2003, at 04:43 Australia/Melbourne, matthew de
Jongh wrote:
i am in the process of upgrading our backup radius server and i am
trying to install radiator on the new
> StatsLog clause. And if you want a tool to restart Radiator
> automatically and let you know why it did so, you should use the
> "restartWrapper" utility provided in the goodies directory for this
> purpose. See the relevant sections of the Radiator 3.4 reference manual.
Another (very conveni
Hello Steven -
You would specify different UDP port numbers for each instance of
Radiator.
regards
Hugh
On Wednesday, Nov 20, 2002, at 15:25 Australia/Melbourne,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
BTW how can i run multi-copy of Radiator in the same machine.
Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTEC
Thanks.
BTW how can i run multi-copy of Radiator in the same machine.
Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 20/11/2002 09:58 AM
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Nikolai,
Do you use an SQL statement to effect the disabling of accounts that
have exceded the maximum bad login counts or do you use a combination
of SQL and hooks?
Also I see Tunnel-Type = L2TP in your config, what NAS device do you
use? Do you have certificate server running?
Regards,
Tunde
Hello Rabbie -
This topic has been discussed on the mailing list many times.
Have a look at the archive site and do a search on "blacklist".
www.open.com.au/archives/radiator
regards
Hugh
On Monday, Nov 18, 2002, at 13:06 Australia/Melbourne, Rabbie Zalaf
wrote:
Sorry, forgot attachment.
VENDORATTR 2352 Session-Error-Code 142
integer
VENDORATTR 2352 Session-Error-Msg 143
string
- Original Message -
From: "Karel van der Velden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:02
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
AbdusSami
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Hugh Irvine
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002
9:51 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (RADIATOR) Re: Upgrade
Procedure
Hello
Some additional tips which have been discussed before:
When upgrading from major versions (2.x to 3.x), it is best to do some
testing by installing it in a 'lab' system. Especially if the
revisions differ in the way they do things. We had an issue before
that affected the assignment of IP add
Hello AbdusSami -
I have had another look at the log file, and the problem may be due to
the way you have specified the queries in the SessionDatabase SQL
clause. The DeleteQuery shown below will delete all sessions in the
session database for a given user when the access request is received
L PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:48 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: DefaultLeasePeriod
Hello Tunde -
By definition a customer with a permanent connection would not use a dynamic address.
You should allocate such users static addresses instead.
regards
Hugh
NB: I am travelling this wee
To: Ayotunde Itayemi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:48
PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re:
DefaultLeasePeriod
Hello Tunde -By definition a customer with a
permanent connection would not use a dynamic address.You should
allocate such users static addresses
instead.regardsHugh
S brands here, I
> won't be able to help.
>
> regards,
> cl.
>
>
>> From: "Ingvar Berg (EAB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re: DefaultLeasePeriod
>> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:18:26 +0200
>>
S brands here, I won't be able to help.
regards,
cl.
>From: "Ingvar Berg (EAB)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re: DefaultLeasePeriod
>Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 16:18:26 +0200
>
>Just thought that it would be A Nice Thing, if
s,
Tunde I.
- Original Message -
From:
Hugh Irvine
To: Ayotunde Itayemi
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 2:48
PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re:
DefaultLeasePeriod
Hello Tunde -By
definition a customer with a permanent connection would not use
Just thought that it would be A Nice Thing, if the NAS could act as a DHCP relay, and
leave it to the client and the DHCP server to do this the standard way. (A Nice Thing
usually exists already, and can be found, you just have to know where to search ;-).
/Ingvar
> -Original Message-
Hello Ingvar -
No I have never seen such a thing.
This is because the end client device must start a session (usually PPP)
*before* it can send TCP/UDP packets.
regards
Hugh
On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 11:41 PM, Ingvar Berg (EAB) wrote:
> Does anyone know how to set up clients, NAS etc
Hello Tunde -
By definition a customer with a permanent connection would not use a dynamic address.
You should allocate such users static addresses instead.
regards
Hugh
On Monday, August 19, 2002, at 10:10 PM, Ayotunde Itayemi wrote:
Hi Hugh,
One, I assume the checkattribute ( Service-Ty
Does anyone know how to set up clients, NAS etc to make the client use a DHCP server
at the ISP? Is it as simple as doing a normal DHCP configuration in the client, and
then set up your DHCP server? Or do you have to configure the NAS as well? Because
such a setup would allow the client to rene
Hi Hugh,
One, I assume the checkattribute ( Service-Type =
Framed-User,Time ="Al-2400",Simultaneous-Use = 1)
implies "always-on 24-7-365" access for the
user?
My aim is to allow clients with DSL access
(alwayson-24-7-365) to remain on without
radiatior reclaiming the
IP address allo
: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 10:57
PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Multiple
Calling-Station-Id
Hello Tunde -As always, the only way I can see what is
going on is by looking at the configuration file and the trace 4
debug.regardsHughOn Thursday, August 15, 2002, at
06:14 AM, Ayotunde
Hello Tunde -
As always, the only way I can see what is going on is by looking at the configuration file and the trace 4 debug.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 06:14 AM, Ayotunde Itayemi wrote:
Hi Hugh,
Thanks for the replies. I noticed a curious thing though I am not sure of e
Hello Claudio -
You cannot use regular expressions in SQL queries, but SQL itself is
designed with pattern matching capabilities.
regards
Hugh
On Thursday, August 15, 2002, at 06:05 AM, Claudio Lapidus wrote:
> Hello Hugh,
>
> Lurking over this thread, I see that you define how to handle a
Hi Hugh,
Thanks for the replies. I noticed a curious thing
though I am not sure of exactly when it happened.
I changed one of the IP address pools defined in my
to the same name
as the identifier for a NAS. Below is the
DYNAADDRESS clause I used for the Handler for the NAS.
The thing is tha
Hello Hugh,
Lurking over this thread, I see that you define how to handle a partial ANI
number match:
>For your first point, you could also use something like this:
>
>
>
We have a similar situation here, but we need to discriminate _pairs_ of
Called-Station-Id plus the first few digits of Ca
"Hugh Irvine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ayotunde Itayemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Mike McCauley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Radiator and Windows Encryption
>
&
Hello Tunde -
I will let Mike deal with the first part of your message.
For the second part, you will need to write a PostAuthHook to do what
you describe.
You will find some example hooks in the file "goodies/hooks.txt".
regards
Hugh
On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 03:34 AM, Ayotunde Ita
Hello -
As I can't find you in our customer database, could you please send me the
name of the registered company that has purchased this copy of Radiator?
thanks
Hugh
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 09:42, X-Wildph wrote:
> Hi All,
> What do i need to do to make Radiator add some attributes to th
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 10:00, Mike McCauley wrote:
> -- Forwarded Message --
>
> Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) Re: Feature request for AuthBy LDAP2
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 09:49:23 +1000
> From: Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jeremy Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hello Jeremy -
Many thanks for your contribution. Mike will look at it when he gets back
from his travels next week.
regards
Hugh
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 06:17, Jeremy Hinton wrote:
> Well, after digging around, i figured why not just do the fix
> myself. So without further ado, following is a
Hello Scott,
You may want to look at radiusContext:
http://www.tummy.com/Software/radiuscontext
Regards,
Neil D. Quiogue
"Information and attachments herein are intended for the named recipients
only. It may contain attorney-client privileged or confidential matter.
If you have received this
Hello Vignesa -
You will have to look at a trace 4 debug to see what is actually contained in
the radius request packet. You will need to find something unique that will
give you each individual session. With this information you can define your
own queries for the session database to do what
Dear Hugh,
The problem we are faced with is that the NAS we use does not use ports. It
sends the port type as "5" being virtual to the Radius. So all sessions by
any user gets stored in the database with having a port of "0" as such, when
the "delete from RADONLINE where NASIDENTIFIER='%1' and NA
Hello Doug -
Could you please tell me the name of the registered Radiator customer that
you are representing?
In answer to your question, you can use either approach you describe, however
I tend to prefer proxying the radius requests as it is much more lightweight
and easier to manage.
rega
So will I be successful at having all 3 radius servers
auth out of the same DB? with start/stop packets &
timebanking Or would proxying to a single radius
which does all auth againist the db be the best way to
go?
--- Hugh Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Doug -
>
> You are cor
Hello Ray -
If the Cisco supports standard Radius authentication, together with the
Session-Timeout reply attribute, it is relatively easy to build a
configuration file for prepaid services (using an SQL database).
regards
Hugh
On Fri, 3 May 2002 17:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello Steve -
No NAS-Port is not unique. Every NAS has a certain number of ports, and those
ports get reused constantly.
regards
Hugh
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002 05:01, Steve Brown wrote:
> My fault, spoke to soon. It appears that the Boardtown RadiusNT scripts
> setup the calls table so NASPort is
T Inc.
www.isdn.net
+1 615-221-4200
> -Original Message-
> From: Ronan Eckelberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:04 PM
> To: 'Leon Oosterwijk'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin'
: Thursday, 04 April, 2002 11:33
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Leon Oosterwijk
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
Hugh,
I did use the example in the goodies. I had to make some changes. It's
good
to know that the hook get's evaled just onc
ely,
Leon Oosterwijk
ISDN-NET Inc.
www.isdn.net
+1 615-221-4200
> -Original Message-
> From: Leon Oosterwijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:33 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; Leon Oosterwijk
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> S
Acct-Session-Id = "367167979"
Ascend-Data-Rate = 64000
Ascend-Xmit-Rate = 64000
Sincerely,
Leon Oosterwijk
ISDN-NET Inc.
www.isdn.net
+1 615-221-4200
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugh Irvine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 03,
riginal Message-
> > From: Frank Danielson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:41 AM
> > To: Leon Oosterwijk; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
> >
> >
> > Instead of using fork and sy
sterwijk; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Goin' Crazy
>
>
> Instead of using fork and synchronous you should probably
> look into doing the AuthBy DYNADDRESS in a PostReplyHook
> which gets run after a reply from your remote radius server.
> There a
Instead of using fork and synchronous you should probably look into doing
the AuthBy DYNADDRESS in a PostReplyHook which gets run after a reply from
your remote radius server. There are some examples of performing an AuthBy
in a hook in the goodies/hooks.txt file in the distribution.
-Origina
et a "dialer
idle-timeout".
-Ronan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Mike McCauley
Sent: Wednesday, 06 March, 2002 16:39
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re: Fwd: Re: [Oz-ISP] AS5200's and IOS12.1
-- Forwar
04) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:51:14 -0500
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Robert Blayzor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re: Fwd: Re: [Oz-ISP] AS5200's and IOS12.1
D
valid for 111"
Thanks for the suggestion,
William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Frank Danielson
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 2:02 PM
To: William Hernandez; Radiator (Radiator)
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Reject access from specif
r)
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) RE: Reject access from specific
Calling-Station-Id
If you want to block access for all users when that combination of
Calling-Station-Id and Called-Station-Id is used, why not do it in a
handler?
AuthResult REJECT
AcctS
If you want to block access for all users when that combination of
Calling-Station-Id and Called-Station-Id is used, why not do it in a
handler?
AuthResult REJECT
AcctStartResult ACCEPT
AcctStopResult ACCEPT
DefaultRe
Hello Chairath -
You will need to make the same change that you made to the Radiator
configuration file in the Radmin file called "Radmin/Sql.pm". You will either
need to change the file in the Radmin distribution directory and re-install,
or you can change the file in the Perl hierarchy dire
Hello Buck -
Please send me a trace 4 debug from Radiator showing what is happening.
thanks
Hugh
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 10:13, buck lane wrote:
> hey all, i am trying to use radpwtst to test to see if i can
> authenticate, i am authenticating to a ms sql DB on win2k. i have
> unixODBC with the
Hello Barry -
Radiator will re-read the users file automatically if it is changed.
The configuration file is never re-read unless Radiator is explicitly
signalled or restarted.
regards
Hugh
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:13, Barry Andersson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How often does Radiator re-read the conf
Hello Utku -
You can use DBD::ODBC and a commercial ODBC driver, or you can use
DBD::ODBC-Proxy, or you can run a copy of Radiator on the MS box and proxy
the relevant radius packets directly to it.
This topic has been discussed on the list many times so check the archive
site and do a searc
Sam,
In your Radiator directory there is a directory called 'goodies', in there
you will find a file called 'ansiCreate.sql'.
If you run that in you Oracle database it will create the default tables for
Radiator.
Read it carefully first so you understand what it does.
Also download the manual
Hello Barry -
This is but one reason why most operators just use stop records and
calculate the start time by subtracting the Acct-Session-Time.
regards
Hugh
At 21:03 +1100 01/11/9, Barry Andersson wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>I'm intrigued as to how others handle the change to and from Dayligh
Yep,
You'll have to use the cisco-avpair (you should be able to find the exact
syntax to use in Radiator - I'm sure Hugh can help you with that). The
syntax for the cisco is as follows (we're using the AS5350, and this works
like a champ):
ip:dns-servers=20.1.20.21 20.1.20.23
ip:inacl#1=permit i
Hello Paul -
You have to specify which AuthLog you want to use, FILE, SQL or SYSLOG.
#define AuthLog FILE
.
hth
Hugh
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 15:53, Paul Thorton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As per previous email. I have attempted to use the AuthLog option
> instead
> to get the code
Hugh:
The length of the CHECKATTR & REPLYATTR is 400 characters. Find below some
information (Config, ReplyAttr & Trace 4 Debug)
Config File:
Foreground
LogStdout
LogDir e:/radiator/radiator-2.18.2
DbDir e:/radiator/radiator-2.18.2
Trace 3
LogFile %L/logfile
AuthPort 1645
AcctPort 16
Hello 'Tunde -
You usually do this by specifying a suitable Framed-IP-Netmask in the reply
attributes, but you will have to check with the vendor what is correct for a
Netserver.
Here is what usually works however:
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.254
regards
Hugh
On Thursday 06 S
Hugh:
We have series of Netservers that assign specific range of IP to connecting
customers. We want to force compliance from within Radius. This means that
specifying in RADIUS what IP range the Netserver can assign to the customer.
'Tunde Ogedengbe
Linkserve Limited
22 Akin Adesola Street
Vi
As a follow-up, I wanted to let everyone know that Radiator will run fine
when PERL is compiled with thread support, but perl-ldap will not work
properly. Compiling PERL non-threaded will solve this problem.
Regards,
Eric
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Hugh Irvine wrote:
>
> Hello Eric -
>
> Radiator
Hello Eric -
Radiator itself, as well as many Perl modules, does not support
multi-threading currently.
regards
Hugh
>
> Hrm. What i meant was OpenLDAP 2.0.8. I'm currently in the process of
> compiling a non-threaded version of PERL (5.6.1) to see if this fixes it.
> Apparently perl-lda
Yeah, an "API" reference would make hook writing a lot easier.
Andrew
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Kitabjian, Dave
Sent: Thursday, 19 April 2001 2:20 AM
To: 'Simon Hackett'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RAD
Hello Dave, Hello Simon -
I have copied this to Mike for his comments, however from my own experience
you are far better off reading the source in any case. Mike's programming
style and copious comments make this a real pleasure.
Simon -
My suggestion would also be to use a PostAuthHook, an
Actually, I'd love to see the whole(?) API which is available to us in Hooks
documented in an appendix to the venerable "manual" :) A few are mentioned
throughout already, like get_attr(). But for most you have to look through
the source.
Dave
:O
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Hacket
Hello AbdusSami -
On Sunday 25 February 2001 01:23, Mohammed AbdusSami wrote:
> Dear Hugh,
>
> As you suggested I had made changes to Authby clauses. From dos prompt when
> I test by radpwtst it is successfully accepting the password. But by Dialup
> it is saying password is not correct.
>
> Ple
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Hugh Irvine
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 9:20 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re:
Hello AbdusSami -
You do not make these changes on the NAS, you simply modify your
Hello Iris -
It looks to me like your configuration file is doing multiple
AuthBy's and a later one is accepting the request. Could you send me
a copy of your configuration file please (no secrets)?
thanks
Hugh
At 15:10 -0600 01/2/22, Iris Silva wrote:
>Hello Hugh, following your instruct
Hello Hugh, following your instructions, I did the following:
- To create an account called kids with GID "kids"
- To create a default:
DEFAULT2Time = SuMoTu0600-1000, Auth-Type = System, Group = "kids", Prefix =
"P",
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Hello AbdusSami -
You do not make these changes on the NAS, you simply modify your
configuration file to add the reply attributes in your two AuthBy
clauses. Something like:
AddToReply Service-Type = Framed-User, \
Framed-Protocol = PPP, \
Session-Timeo
:48 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re:
Hello AdbusSami -
Thank you for sending the debug output, but it just demonstrates what
I pointed out in my previous mail, in that you are only sending back
to the NAS a Framed-IP-Address and Framed-IP-Netmask in the
]On
>Behalf Of Hugh Irvine
>Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:27 AM
>To: Mohammed AbdusSami
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re:
>
>
>
>Hello AbdusSami -
>
>At 18:07 +0300 01/2/18, Mohammed AbdusSami wrote:
>>Dear Hugh,
>>
>>Please have a l
TECTED]]On
Behalf Of Hugh Irvine
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 4:27 AM
To: Mohammed AbdusSami
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (RADIATOR) Re:
Hello AbdusSami -
At 18:07 +0300 01/2/18, Mohammed AbdusSami wrote:
>Dear Hugh,
>
>Please have a look on attached configuration file. Actu
Hello Samantha -
I think you may need Radiator 2.18 (now in beta testing) to do this,
unless you want to get into the code yourself. There have been some
discussions on the mailing list about doing more advanced logging,
and we have added additional capabilities to 2.18 in response to
these
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
