* court3nay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060805 13:30]:
> By the way.. we just passed $13,000 in donations. Yay, community!
>
> I'm going to need a NPO (non-profit) to funnel this through, what do you (i.e.
> core-list) people think about a Rails foundation?
It takes a long time to get 501(c)(3)'s set u
* zdennis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060716 20:33]:
> Could someone check this out and give some feedback? I have started to
> develop this as a separate plugin for ActiveRecord, but the more I think
> about it the more it seems that this sort of thing should be in core.
> Thoughts?
Those are impressive
* Michael A. Schoen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060707 22:18]:
> Tom: let me know if you'd like a copy of the script I use to test
> against the Oracle adapter after every checkin. It's not very fancy, but
> it does a good job spamming rails-core when stuff breaks. ;-)
We have some interest in providin
* Steve Longdo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060331 15:21]:
> good stuff!
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DAMAGECONTROL/
> Continuous+Integration+Server+Feature+Matrix
We've found the simple continuous_builder plugin for rails to be qui
* Michael Schoen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060228 20:03]:
> Yeah, except that seems backwards -- the key actually is an int, would
> be nice if we could leave it that way. Actually forcing it to a string
> in calculations seems odd.
>
> I was also thinking that it could be resolved by returning somet
* Kevin Clark ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060220 14:54]:
> The problem is the dependence tree. If you do it with timestamps, by
> inserting your own migrations you may change things later migrations
> depend on. Similarly, we lose the simplicity of VER#_description
> because you wouldn't be able to use fi
* Adam Ballai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060220 14:30]:
> Is this the correct way to set a finalizer or am I going about it the
> wrong way. I need to close a socket connection _after_ the model goes
> out of scope where GC usually happens. Do models get GC'd after a page
> is done loading?
Adam,
I
* Michael Koziarski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060220 14:09]:
> On 2/20/06, Kyle Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What if, instead of a simple integer sequence, migrations used timestamps?
>
> Could we do that in a backwards compatible way? The problem of local,
> uncommited migrations isn't somet
* Rick Olson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060220 01:15]:
> To work around this, I just started creating temporary models per
> migration. I find that much nicer than reverting to
> ActiveRecord::Base.connection for my delicate sql needs. It might be
> best to create the temporary model classes inside the
First, long-winded thought #1:
Today I was playing with a Rails app (Typo) and wanted to add a
migration to support a new column in one of the data tables -- purely
for some functionality that's almost certainly only of interest to me in
my little Weblogging Kingdom. I immediately realized that i
Kevin,
Thanks for the good work putting this together.
> There are some important limitations to note. Most importantly, it uses
> the ActiveRecord after_find callback. This means that if you are using
> this callback already, you will need to call super in your callback
> routine somewher
Hi all,
I've submitted a ticket w/ patch & unit test for a problem we
encountered with RJS templates. Since this is my first pass at going
the patch + unit test route, could I convince someone to give it a quick
eyeball to make sure I didn't do anything stupid (or at least abnormally
so)?
Thanks
* Rick Olson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060209 16:15]:
> Check out the ActionView tests. Here's the tag helper tests, for example:
>
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/browser/trunk/actionpack/test/template/tag_helper_test.rb
>
> The url_for tests require a controller, so you'll see some of them
> creating
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3775
I'm hoping someone will pop up and tell me I'm simply daft with this
ticket (and queries on IRC, and a prior post to the main Rails list),
but I can't get a peep out of anyone so far.
The question is, how do I write a simple test for a helper method
* Jean-Christophe Michel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051230 17:33]:
> I'm wondering if there is a simple solution to call a method once per
> page request.
>
> I tried to place my call in a before_filter in ApplicationController but
> it'd called a second time if I use render_component from a view.
> See
Gurus (Guri? heh),
We got burned today by #2018 ("rake appdoc fails on Windows systems"),
and did a bunch of ferreting around (starting at the problems in
rdoc,rake,rdoc.bat) and ultimately came back to the conclusion that the
cleanest way to fix the problem is just a variation on a suggestion
alr
* Michael Schoen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051212 14:15]:
> Can you try modifying oci_adapter.rb, and change OCIAdapter#active? to
> use @connection.active? instead of @connection.ping. The
> OCI8AutoRecover#active? method doesn't hit the db at all, it just
> returns the last known state. This will b
* Ara.T.Howard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051213 12:45]:
> now, why this seems to be platform dependant i do not understand yet -
> but the combination of autoloading hooks, require overrides, and
> non-protected (unless defined?...) class defs and method aliases seem
> fragile.
The only thought I have
A vote of confidence for 0.14.4 -> 1.0: We've successfully moved our
app to 0.14.4. We have the following code stats:
+--+---+---+-+-+-+---+
| Name | Lines | LOC | Classes | Methods | M/C | LOC/M |
+--+
* Jeremy Kemper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051209 15:50]:
> http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3133
I owe you a beer, man. I was about 45 minutes from making that same
patch. I somehow missed that ticket in the timeline.
Thanks!
Rick
--
http://www.rickbradley.comMUPRN: 972
* Wilson Bilkovich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051209 11:20]:
> Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but what about just defining a
> "no-op" query for each adapter. In Oracle, that would be, say,
> "select * from dual".
> Many Java connection pool implementations have such a thing, and
> execute it when a
* Duane Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051207 14:30]:
> As for the remaining variable, the port, it seems reasonable to
> include it in the :host. Or else we can add another delimiter such
> as a pipe:
>
> map.connect 'proto://:host|:port/:controller/:action/:id'
Good points.
Again, not havin
* Duane Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051207 14:00]:
> I have a patch coming soon (when I get authorization from my
> employer) that will allow the use of the host name (domain, subdomain
> etc.) in routes. Here's the syntax I'm working with right now:
>
> map.connect '//:host/:controller/:a
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/2837
This should be an easy commit for someone. The appropriate path isn't
being used for Checkout.new in the continuous_builder plugin. I may be
the only person outside the original developers to have gotten under the
hood to hack around, but I turned this up,
24 matches
Mail list logo
