On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:02 PM, James Healy wrote:
>
> An alternative would be to host a nginx/varnish/something proxy on EC2
> in Australia that maintains a keep alive HTTP connection to the
> upstream app servers in the US.
>
>
> This sounds like what CloudFront does, and Sydney already has a
And when it rains, it pours :) Thanks Adam, we have two projectors coming, so
you don't need to worry now. Really appreciate the offer though.
On 15/11/2012, at 3:00 PM, Adam McNeil wrote:
> I can bring a small Dell M110 which will work for relatively low light
> conditions if no one has anyth
That would be fantastic, and much appreciated Luke. Thanks heaps.
Thanks also to the guys at Inspire9, who've agreed to bring one along as well.
I think we can call this one: case closed!
On 15/11/2012, at 2:56 PM, Luke Chadwick wrote:
> realestate.com.au can supply one. I've got it under my
I can bring a small Dell M110 which will work for relatively low light
conditions if no one has anything better?
On 15 November 2012 14:02, Tim McEwan wrote:
> At Byron, a few camps ago, we hired one locally. Is that an option?
>
>
> On 15/11/2012, at 13:21, Warren Seen wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
>
At Byron, a few camps ago, we hired one locally. Is that an option?
On 15/11/2012, at 13:21, Warren Seen wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Just wondering if any of you coming to Railscamp tomorrow are able to bring a
> projector? Or if you know someone coming and are able to send one down with
> them fo
Hey all,
Just wondering if any of you coming to Railscamp tomorrow are able to bring a
projector? Or if you know someone coming and are able to send one down with
them for the weekend?
I've asked a couple of times, and had no response so far :(
--
You received this message because you are sub
I think it's $200, but yes, it's not something you're going to use
everywhere...
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jak Charlton wrote:
> Apparently it costs around $800 per month per website
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Simon Russell wrote:
>
>> > An alternative would be to host a ngi
I want it
Sent from my iPhone
On 15/11/2012, at 10:32 AM, Charles Dale wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I rolled my ankle on Monday and it's taking a while to improve. Not looking
> forward to hobbling around Railscamp - let me know if you'd like my ticket.
>
> Cheers,
> Chuck
>
> --
> You received this
Hi guys,
I rolled my ankle on Monday and it's taking a while to improve. Not looking
forward to hobbling around Railscamp - let me know if you'd like my ticket.
Cheers,
Chuck
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
or Rails Oceania" group.
To post to
Apparently it costs around $800 per month per website
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Simon Russell wrote:
> > An alternative would be to host a nginx/varnish/something proxy on EC2
> > in Australia that maintains a keep alive HTTP connection to the
> > upstream app servers in the US.
>
> This
> An alternative would be to host a nginx/varnish/something proxy on EC2
> in Australia that maintains a keep alive HTTP connection to the
> upstream app servers in the US.
This reminded me of:
https://www.cloudflare.com/railgun
Which I'd been meaning to find out more about; anyone tried it? See
The not using Rails.env.development? call is certainly a good idea, I
usually use a config yaml file, rather than the config/environment things
(that way I can configure it in production with capistrano or chef,
depending on need).
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:04 AM, jamesl wrote:
> Did this sort
I'd love to try Pandemic
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 1:17:49 AM UTC+11, Daryl wrote:
>
> Pandemic is great. I *totally* distracted my entire dysfunctional family
> over Xmas getting us to play that cooperatively. Love the mechanics of how
> well it plays (and the math is pretty interesting t
+1 for having frontside cache servers in multiple regions.
As long as you have reasonably cacheable content it can be a pretty
substantial speed improvement.
On Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:02:50 PM UTC+11, James Healy wrote:
>
> On 14 November 2012 09:52, John Dalton >
> wrote:
> > Having a
Did this sort of thing yesterday, adding to config/initializers to setup
the default provider and then in
config/environments overriding as necessary.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
or Rails Oceania" group.
To view this discussion on the web
Not overly relevant but I like how OmniAuth allows you to put it into test mode
so it will return fake data rather than hitting providers. Very useful in
development mode!
Also I tend to configure my APIs on a per environment basis, and have those
settings in the relevant environment/#{env}.rb
On 14 November 2012 09:52, John Dalton wrote:
> Having an app hosted in Sydney talking to a DB server in the USA will
> be much slower than having both servers in the USA - this is because
> your app will typically make multiple DB calls per request, so you're
> multiplying the delay rather than r
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Jason Kotchoff
wrote:
>
> Does anyone know whether there might be any heroku plans to be able to
> choose a data center for a heroku app?
Can't say anything for Heroku, but Engine Yard will have Sydney as an
option very soon.
> ie. would regional servers (eg. an
18 matches
Mail list logo
