On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:36:24PM +1000, Gregory McIntyre wrote:
> +1 to that. I found that using Gentoo for my servers put the bleeding
> in bleeding edge. Maybe if you're more pro than I am it is okay? I
> like Ubuntu Server LTS now.
This site is somewhat old now, but still contains all you nee
I'm definitely no expert in server admin. I guess I'm lucky in the sense
that the platform admins are willing to support whatever package I may
require.
Re Gentoo portage breakage, I've heard from the admins, IRC seems to be the
channel for most if not all Gentoo news :) LOL
And I think the t
+1 to that. I found that using Gentoo for my servers put the bleeding
in bleeding edge. Maybe if you're more pro than I am it is okay? I
like Ubuntu Server LTS now.
-Greg
On 24 July 2012 10:29, Andrew Stone wrote:
>
> As an aside, I consistently found Gentoo's portage tree far too unstable
> ev
As an aside, I consistently found Gentoo's portage tree far too unstable
even for development use (2006-09)... unfortunately the maintainers of
portage were more than happy to break your system; without even using the
news feature of portage to warn of impending doom.
I switched to Arch in 2009 fo
Thanks guys!
I'm suspecting the issue might be caused by libxml ... I remember the
platform engineer was messing around with the emerge on Gentoo when
installing Nokogiri dependencies.
I'll dig deeper when I can get more time allocated from the
platform engineer :)
On Friday, 20 July 2012 20
That you can run it individually and it passes suggests that there is a
test interdependency. Any before(:all) calls in your tests? Any tests that
write to disk? Can you run the entire suite manually in whatever manner you
ran the single test manually? It would help confirm that theory. If it can
b
Hey Jim, in my experience there's always a logic behind seemingly
'random' failures (a test fails but... changing the order of tests
causes it to pass, adding debugging causes it to pass, works locally but
fails on CI, works on CI but fails locally, only works in isolation,
fails in isolation b
Hi guys,
I have a problem with one of my capybara-webkit based integration tests.
It's passing on my local machine (TM) ... but it fails when the CI does the
build. What's even more interesting is if I run the single failing spec on
the CI server manually, it passes.
I fluked and fixed it ...
