Hi Claudio,
looks interesting. i think both libs have their advantages. would you be
interested to pick the best of both and merge them? i would.
some comments on yours:
i extracted positioning from the Tooltip "Class" to be more flexible,
but probably some positioning code should stay there.
Can anyone confirm or deny this? Or not confirm or deny it?
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 02:34:09PM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I noticed that the latest control.js disables auto complete:
>
> this.element.setAttribute('autocomplete','off');
>
> So I removed my inline "autocomplete='off'" from
Hi and sorry if this has already been discussed. I'm new on theese
lists, and I couldn't find a way to search through them.
I have been looking at the sources of script.aculo.us and I'm rather
impressed by the Enumerable class. What I don't get is why you choose
to extend Array.prototype with this
Well, I have made a lot of progress, however I have problems doing the
transition between effects, I REALLY need some help with this. The diff
is on http://www.railsdevelopment.com/code/pair.diff ...
I think we need to do some put all setup that modifies the dom object to
aftersetup (and only ca
Well, I’m working on a scriptaculous-based
slideshow object right now. Since you can set custom effects to be used
to show/hide the photos, and you can set the delay between swapping photos, I
would think something like that would be possible. I’m hoping to
have some code to share this we
> > Ummm... I'm not sure if this is the "correct way". It may be the
> normal
> > way for
> > some languages/frameworks (PHP?), but it's not standard. Java, C and
> Perl
> > (just
> > a few off the top of my head) don't do it that the square-bracket
way.
>
> Well, you may be right, but I do rememb
I saw a Flash-based photo-flipper on TagWorld (http://www.tagworld.com/thepostalservice) and thought it would be nice to do something similar in Scripaculous. Anyone interested in taking a shot at it?
Since rotation isn't supported in CSS, what I would imagine would be a z-ordered "stack" of DIVs,
> Ummm... I'm not sure if this is the "correct way". It may be the
normal
> way for
> some languages/frameworks (PHP?), but it's not standard. Java, C and
Perl
> (just
> a few off the top of my head) don't do it that the square-bracket way.
Well, you may be right, but I do remember reading it some
Gregory Hill wrote:
> No, that is just normal URL encoding %5b%5d is [], indicating that the
> argument should be treated as an array. I know that many systems will
> also create an array from the argument name if it simply passed more
> than once in the argument list. I.E.
> secondlist=1,secon
Hi
i wrote that lib too in the last weekend, but only today see your email
download it here:
http://www.pdvel.com/stuff/js/tooltip/tooltip.js
you can view and test the demo at:
http://www.pdvel.com/stuff/js/tooltip/
On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 18:23 +0100, Matthias Platzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> th
No, that is just normal URL encoding %5b%5d is [], indicating that the
argument should be treated as an array. I know that many systems will
also create an array from the argument name if it simply passed more
than once in the argument list. I.E.
secondlist=1,secondlist=2,secondlist=3 would creat
Hi Gregory,
thanks for figuring it out!
Another thing is, Sortable.serialize() returns following string:
Recieved Ajax Request:
Ajax=true&secondlist%5b%5d=1&secondlist%5b%5d=2&secondlist%5b%5d=3&secondlist%5b%5d=5&secondlist%5b%5d=4&_=
Seems strange to me (some sort of Base64 encoding?), do
Prototype version: 1.4.0
Effects version: 1.51
I've recently been working alot with Scriptaculous and Prototype and
I've got some good looking results in FF and IE. However, Safari is
killing me! I would love for someone to look at this, and tell me if
its my design or the libraries.
One e
Oops, 1 typo in there:
> node.id = 'item_' + (node.childNodes.length + 1);
node.childNodes.length should be $('secondlist').childNodes.length
Greg
___
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org
> > and then I add dynamically further elements and create a
Sortable
> > but the onUpdate only fires for items that have not been
created
> > via Javascript.
> >
>
> I wonder if that's the same issue I'm having. My elements were
created
> via javascript and I cannot get the onUpdate to fire a
> and then I add dynamically further elements and create a Sortable
> but the onUpdate only fires for items that have not been created
> via Javascript.
>
I wonder if that's the same issue I'm having. My elements were created
via javascript and I cannot get the onUpdate to fire at all. At lea
Can anyone suggest a way to tell the InPlaceEditor not to break my
text up into multiple lines with new lines in them? It's breaking the
text up around 72 columns, but I don't see a way from the
documentation to prevent this.
Thanks,
Jamie
___
Ra
Hi,
maybe I am using this the wrong way but I have a list as follows
bla bla
bla bla
and then I add dynamically further elements and create a Sortable
but the onUpdate only fires for items that have not been created
via Javascript.
Any clues?
//
18 matches
Mail list logo