Hello Vasilis,
Am Dienstag, den 15.08.2006, 18:10 +0300 schrieb Vasilis Dourdounis:
> On some further research I noticed that, instead of adding the
> observer to every element, you could simply do the following:
thanks that looks like the perfect solution to me. I'll try it later,
but I think th
I couldn't agree more. And as Thomas himself has expressed here... optimization is the very last thing you need to worry about.On 8/15/06, Brandon Aaron
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1 - Is every object that is extended by Enumerable going to have iterable> class names?Yes but it will probably be n
> Exactly that is also my problem. Oky not mine but also a
> customer of mine
> wants the shift click.
> Statement: Shift click does the same as click but opens in new window"
> Problem: I have some functionality that changes a area you could name
> display-area. The customer now argues that he ex
1 - Is every object that is extended by Enumerable going to have iterable
class names?
Yes but it will probably be necessary to overwrite the _each method so
that the Enumerable knows how to iterate through your collection. At
least this is my understanding.
2 - Just how much "baggage" is too
Hi
>- shift-click stuff shouldn't break things
>(probably doesn't do what the user wants either, but...)
Exactly that is also my problem. Oky not mine but also a customer of mine
wants the shift click.
Statement: Shift click does the same as click but opens in new window"
Problem: I have some fun
I just don't use links for anything other than things which are supposed to
navigate you to somewhere else. It just seems weird for me to (when I turn off
javascript) have a link sitting on the page doing nothing.
So I do something like:
my
link
And it's always a valid link with or without j
I am trying
to set up a sortable tree (nested unordered lists) that will cross-sort
with a sortable list (single-level unordered list), but it doesn't seem
to work. The sortable tree demo doesn't allow dragging between trees.
Is this something that anyone has tackled and come up with a soluti
I agree. As a "power user" who regularly opens links in multiple tabs
any link to "nowhere" bothers me. Even Thomas' solution doesn't
behave properly on a middle-click, (or shift-click, or whatever OS-
specific combination I need to open a link in a new tab).
If it must be a link, link it t
I'm going to go against the grain here and say I hate it when people use
# as the link. It makes the browser jump to the top of the page, and it
adds a page to the history. Maybe most people prefer that, but I'm not
one of them.
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailt
> It creates a new class/object representing the class names. The class
> is called Element.ClassNames and it is extended by Enumerable. That
> means you can iterate through the element's class names. Pretty cool.
"Extended by Enumerable". Thanks. Now I know where to look.
A good answer usually
"If I hit Ctrl+Alt+Del the computer reboots!"
Anyway, the accepted "normal" solution to this is:
bla
This makes sure:
- page will validate, as "#" is a valid URL
- link doesn't do anything (expect for jumping to the top of the
page) when Javascript isn't active
- shift-click stuff shouldn't
Thanks everyone for your suggestions. I'm off to experiment.
If I find anything useful, I'll post back.
Sam
___
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
Couldn't you just replace the href with javascript:void(0) on links
that you are manipulating? This allows the link to function as
expected when a user doesn't have Javascript enabled and I think it
should address your clients concern.
Brandon
On 8/15/06, William Attwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
The difference between and is the first is an Anchor, while
the second is a Link. If you want to link text but not have it be a 'link',
try putting around the text and have your style/actions in
that tag, including the mouseover effect.
--William
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTEC
By the
way if you want your href also to work (ie allow users to right click and open
in new window) you might want to put some link in the href and attach a function
dynamically to the anchor elements onDomLoad.
ie,
you could have
Click
here
And at
the same, on dom load, you can get a
Sam wrote:
problem. A customer posted a complaint yesterday about how I'm coding
href's when an onclick event is used and the href should not be used.
Stupid question: can you leave out the href entirely? Or does that break
our good friend IE?
Cheers,
Ben
--
Ben Kimball
There's a lot of
old-solutions to this problem lingering on Google, so it's difficult for me to
determine if there's a more modern solution to this problem. A customer
posted a complaint yesterday about how I'm coding href's when an onclick event
is used and the href should not be used.
A couple more observations.
Droppables.add(e, {
hoverclass: 'over',
onDrop: function (drag, drop) {
drag.revert = false;
drop.appendChild(drag);
drag.style.position = 'absolute';
drag.style.left = drag.style.top = 0;
},
});
});
Safari
Hello again,On some further research I noticed that, instead of adding the observer to every element, you could simply do the following: Draggables.addObserver(new MyStartEndObserver($('MySortable')))
Handlers will be called only once, but this gives you no information on which element is dr
script.aculo.us 1.6.2 is ready for download at http://script.aculo.us/
downloads
This release is a (mostly) bug-fix only service release.
As always, thanks to all who did patches and/or reported issues! :)
Reports (good or bad) are welcome. If you find something was omitted
(that is,
pendin
Gmail is great for mailing lists. Gotta love it.
On 8/15/06, Ryan Gahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Huh? I use gmail now... it's supposed to handle this...
When you hit reply, you're supposed to type at the top of the message,
that's what is natural (I would never expect to have to scroll to the
Huh? I use gmail now... it's supposed to handle this... When you hit reply, you're supposed to type at the top of the message, that's what is natural (I would never expect to have to scroll to the bottom to see someone's reply). When you click in the reply box in gmail (or any other mail program I'
Back on topic...
It creates a new class/object representing the class names. The class
is called Element.ClassNames and it is extended by Enumerable. That
means you can iterate through the element's class names. Pretty cool.
On 8/14/06, William Attwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It looks to me
Ryan Gahl wrote:
> When I joined the list I had my own etiquette issues which others politely
> corrected for me (right Jeremy?)... so don't feel like I'm singling you out
> or anything. It's just that from this message I can't see the previous
> messages (I'd have to go dig through my deleted item
Hi ColinI studied the code a bit, and it seems its somewhat different for the Ajax.Autocompleter compared to the Local.Autocompleter. To understand what really happens I've tried to wrap up some of the important events.
1) The ajax request will run onComplete when done, and if you look in the code,
25 matches
Mail list logo
