For the scoping issue you might want to read this:
http://www.iamcal.com/publish/articles/js/scoping/
Cheers, Alex
Am 04.07.2006 um 17:44 schrieb Nicolas Terray:
On 7/4/06, Alexander Presber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is interesting you could build anything "huge" without
It is interesting you could build anything "huge" without knowing the
var declaration.
It declares the scope of the variable to be in the current function
(or global, if you are not in a function definition).
Any reference to a variable inside of a function,, that was NOT
declared local to
their wrong offset ever after.
Since I kept close to the original two-Sortable demo from the
webside, I can only assume, this is a bug or unthought-of case in the
scriptaculous lib.
It happens on IE, Mozilla and Safari.
Any comments are high
s support an each method and want to get rid of some elements
(using a function to determine which)?
reject should do just that, shouldn't it?
Sincerely yours
Alexander Presber
Why not just do...
var b = $H(a.reject(function(val){ return (val[1]==1) }));
? The reject method returning an
functions for
the Enumerable mixin, so that the would be an _addElement() method
for all Classes, that wish to mixin Enumerable and the reject method
(as other Enumerable methods) would call that as opposed to always
creating an Array internally.
Any ideas or comments?
Sincerely you
