* marc-olivier bernard wrote (11/07/06 16:57):
On 7/11/06, Chris Lear wrote:
Are you sure it's a Firefox bug? The way the builder code works is very
strange... to create an option element, it seems to create a select
element, put the option element into it, then fetch the option out of
* marc-olivier bernard wrote (11/07/06 15:26):
On 7/11/06, marc-olivier bernard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am not sure whether the problem is due to Scriptaculous or to
Firefox's DOM Engine.
It is a firefox bug. I posted a comment on Bugzilla Mozilla:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.
* Chris Lear wrote (11/05/06 10:44):
* SPENDLOVE, Matt, GBM wrote (11/05/06 09:45):
I noticed that when i closed a tab in Firefox whose page utilises
prototype 1.4 i got a stream of leaks reported. Not sure if that would
be expected ?
I've just tried this on some code that I've rec
* SPENDLOVE, Matt, GBM wrote (11/05/06 09:45):
I noticed that when i closed a tab in Firefox whose page utilises
prototype 1.4 i got a stream of leaks reported. Not sure if that would
be expected ?
I've just tried this on some code that I've recently I've been cleaning
for IE leaks, so I'm re
* Robin Haswell wrote (27/02/06 12:12):
> Yeah I'm aware of this option. It's not ideal, as this is a CMS and I
> don't want the admin view of the site to be too different. Plus these
> elements are really small. I'd rather get a proper solution rather than
> a hack :-/
Draggables have onStart and
* Ryan Gahl wrote (17/02/06 16:26):
>
> Releasing code that offers new functionality at a cost of $0 to anyone
> who wants to use it is doing everyone a HUGE service, no matter what way
> you want to look at it.
... and I'm a beneficiary. I've incorporated Ryan Gahl's dragdrop.js
enhancements my
* Ryan Gahl wrote (15/02/2006 22:32):
> Nah, I've only ever just submitted my optimizations in isolation to this
> list (only a couple times so far)... seems like Thomas has his hands
> full though since he's not yet responded to any of my suggestions.
In case you're feeling unappreciated... I've
* Bob Silva wrote (13/02/06 09:58):
> Cant. If you write a patch you can. I imagine it will work its way into
> scriptaculous eventually.
Here's some code from DWR:
/ * Copyright 2005 Joe Walker
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file exc
I found that I couldn't register an unload event using prototype.
The reason seems to be that prototype registers an unload event which
unregisters all events, including other unload events. It's commented as
a fix for an IE memory leak.
In case anyone else wants to use unload events, here's a fix
* Maninder, Singh wrote (10/01/2006 06:57):
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Does anyone have any insight into the DWR library
> (http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/index)?
>
> I want to know the pros/cons of using DWR Vs Prototype/Scriptaculous
> libraries.
>
> I am a great fan of the prototype/scriptaculous comb
* Laurie Harper wrote (01/12/2005 15:50):
> On 1-Dec-05, at 6:15 AM, APaella wrote:
>> Maninder, Singh wrote:
>>> This is not working for me (I am using IE 6.0 on WinXP).
>>>
>>> It works in Firefox though...
>>
>> I's only the css that is wrong. The + image isn't displayed but the
>> script works.
11 matches
Mail list logo
