> Hi Gregory
>
> What you think about this
If that's what you want to do, then go ahead. I wanted to keep it
separate from the request so that it can be used in other contexts.
Greg
___
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs@lists.rubyonrails.org
h
eturn node.textContent || node.innerText || node.text || '';
> }
> } );
>
> I think this addresses the 'text' thing as well as keeping things in an
> array if there are sub-elements. So, now your example should be pretty
> much spot-on (except lowercase text vs
n an
array if there are sub-elements. So, now your example should be pretty
much spot-on (except lowercase text vs. TEXT).
Greg
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:rails-spinoffs-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Gahl
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:01
No problem, always try to play Devil's advocate...
Your tool is very nice, I can think of a few applications already.
Thanks for the work.
The information transmitted in this electronic mail is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential,
proprieta
> But what about elements with attributes, nested elements AND/OR text
> values?
It's recursive.
>
> What does:
>
> text
>
> Look like?
I don't think that is handled in the current code. If you have
attributes, you'd need to have nested tags (or nothing). I could add a
conditional that if y
Very nice! Thank you. I'm sure I will be using this.
But what about elements with attributes, nested elements AND/OR text
values?
What does:
text
Look like?
And what does a nested structure like this look like as a hash:
text1
text2
I would expect something similar to...
{
I changed the code to be more prototype-esque, and created a class
called XMLDoc. I may add more functionality to it later, hence the more
generic name, but you do something like this to convert XML to a hash:
XMLDoc = Class.create();
Object.extend(XMLDoc.prototype, {
initialize: function (xmlD
