RE: [Rails-spinoffs] Parsing Querystring

2006-08-14 Thread Sam
> Just out of curiousity Sam, I notice that you are a frequent poster to > this list. Are you writing anything specific or just having fun with > javascript and prototype? Anything you can show off here? > I'm working on an environment to host e-learning course content. Unfortunately I can't send

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Parsing Querystring

2006-08-14 Thread Eric Harrison
No problem. Seth mentioned in a followup post that it needed to be a 'recentish' version of prototype, but I just checked 1.4 provided on http://prototype.conio.net and found it there as well. Anyone using anything less than 1.4 deserves the pain of that choice... ;) Just out of curiousity Sam, I

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Parsing Querystring

2006-08-12 Thread Seth Dillingham
On 8/11/06, Sam wrote: Is there a function somewhere which will take a string containing a URL and return an object with all the querystring key / value pairs? In a recent-ish version of prototype, look at String.toQueryParams (prototype.js:195 in v1.5). Seth _

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Parsing Querystring

2006-08-12 Thread Brandon Aaron
I believe window.location.search.toQueryParams() is what you are looking for. Brandon On 8/11/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a function somewhere which will take a string containing a URL and return an object with all the querystring key / value pairs? Sam _

RE: [Rails-spinoffs] Parsing Querystring

2006-08-12 Thread Sam
> There is one such function exactly: > > String.toQueryParams() > > var url = 'http://test.com/?this=test&perfect=true'; > var params = url.toQueryParams(); > I don't know how I missed this. I'm guessing I had "whole word" set in my editor search. Thanks, Sam

Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Parsing Querystring

2006-08-12 Thread Eric Harrison
There is one such function exactly: String.toQueryParams() var url = 'http://test.com/?this=test&perfect=true'; var params = url.toQueryParams(); /* params = { this: 'test', perfect: 'true' }; */ Is that what you're looking for? -E On 8/11/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is the