On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 05:30:23PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> The newsletter for the Electronic Frontier Foundation is not spam. If
> Razor lists it as spam then the problem is not on my end. The problem is
> with Razor, and it needs to be fixed.
Not to be contrary, but you're wrong. It's your
Marc Perkel, on 2003-02-23, wrote:
> The newsletter for the Electronic Frontier Foundation is not spam. If
> Razor lists it as spam then the problem is not on my end. The problem is
> with Razor, and it needs to be fixed.
A bunch of email users are in a room. A Razor-like system goes out to
them
Title: Message
Why don't you spend your time trying to find out who on your
supposed "opt-in" list reported your mailings to razor. Here's an
idea. Why not send out a message to your list of addresses and tell them
how to unsubscribe from your list instead of hiding it in the lo
on Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 07:13:48PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Adam Goryachev wrote:
> >>folks at moveon.org who said that everything they send is being
> >>flagged by razor as spam.
...
> >Well, if they are sending out the same stuff as the spam I get telling me
> >all about the perils of war, the
The newsletter for the Electronic Frontier Foundation is not spam. If
Razor lists it as spam then the problem is not on my end. The problem
is with Razor, and it needs to be fixed.
Shawn McMahon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:35:30AM -0800, Marc Perkel said:
The idea that there
just my two cents - any filtering system will result in accidentally blocked
messages, its
the responsibility of the sysadmin to regularly review the blocked the
folder
I can't tell from the thread if Razor is being in combination with other
methods
(we use SpamAssassin with Razor and several RBLs
On 2003-02-23 (Sunday) at 10:27:01 -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:35:30AM -0800, Marc Perkel said:
> > The idea that there is nothing that I can do to stop our newsletter from
> > being blacklisted by Razor is unacceptable. That would definitely be the
> > wrong answer.
> > Razor is mildly dependent on people reporting spams, but it is
desperately
> dependent on people not reporting non-spams. There is a BIG difference. If
> you send in real spams, ho hum, there are lots of people doing that, but
> thank you for your support. But if you report one non-spam incorre
> > Besides, who cares if a message is being tagged as spam so long as
> > it's being delivered. Note that I said "tagged". Razor, SA,
> > pyzor, etc are not MTA and don't come with any code to drop a
> > message into the bit-bucket.
>
> YMMV. You can run Razor from within SpamAssassin within Am
Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> > The idea that there is nothing that I can do to stop our newsletter from
> > being blacklisted by Razor is unacceptable. That would definitely be the
> > wrong answer.
> Question: Do you have the same problem with DCC?
> (http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
The premi
On Saturday 22 February 2003 07:06 pm, Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Can't call method "log" on
> unblessed reference at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Razor2/Client/Agent.pm line 212.
>
> Is there something I can do about being unblessed or do I need a
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:35:30AM -0800, Marc Perkel said:
> The idea that there is nothing that I can do to stop our newsletter from
> being blacklisted by Razor is unacceptable. That would definitely be the
> wrong answer.
If you're unable to accept the idea, the problem is on your end.
Actu
> Yesterday Razor caused the Electronic Frontier Foundation's newsletter
> to not reach possibly thousands of subscribing members. I want to be
> able to prevent this from happening in the future. How do I contact the
> complaining person(s) so that I can remove them from the list and make
> sure t
13 matches
Mail list logo
